Fermi temperature of a 1D electron gas

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Fermi temperature of a one-dimensional electron gas, specifically in the context of a one-dimensional metal wire with one free electron per atom and an atomic spacing of d. The original poster presents two approaches to determine the Fermi temperature, highlighting discrepancies between the results obtained from each method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the Fermi temperature using two different methods: one at absolute zero temperature and another at the Fermi temperature. They express confidence in the first method but seek clarification on the second approach, which yields a significantly larger result.
  • Some participants question the assumption that the chemical potential, μ, is zero at the Fermi temperature, referencing confusion stemming from a textbook figure and noting that this may only apply to specific cases.
  • Others suggest that the behavior of μ at the Fermi temperature differs between one-dimensional and three-dimensional systems, with references to external resources for further context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the chemical potential at the Fermi temperature and comparing results from different dimensional cases. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of μ, but no consensus has been reached regarding the original poster's second approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the assumptions about the chemical potential may vary between different dimensional systems, and there is a reference to specific figures and equations from external sources that illustrate these differences. The original poster's problem is framed within the constraints of homework rules, emphasizing the need for understanding rather than providing direct solutions.

DrClaude
Mentor
Messages
8,478
Reaction score
5,697

Homework Statement



Consider a one-dimensional metal wire with one free electron per atom and an atomic spacing of ##d##. Calculate the Fermi temperature.

Homework Equations



Energy of a particle in a box of length ##L##: ##E_n = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2} n^2##

1D density of states: ##g(E) = \frac{L}{\pi \hbar} \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\epsilon}}##

Fermi temperature: ##T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{E_\mathrm{F}}{k_\mathrm{B}}##

Fermi-Dirac occupancy: ##\bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} = \left[ e^{\beta (E - \mu)} + 1 \right]^{-1}##

The Attempt at a Solution



The solution is easy to find by considering the system at ##T=0##, where one simply needs to calculate the energy of the highest occupied level. For ##N## electrons, with ##2## electrons per ##n## state, i.e., ##N= 2 n_\mathrm{max}##,
$$
\begin{align*}
E_\mathrm{F} &= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2} n_\mathrm{max}^2 \\
&= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2} \left(\frac{N}{2} \right)^2 \\
&= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m} \left(\frac{N}{L} \right)^2 \\
&= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m d^2}
\end{align*}
$$
since ##N/L = 1/d##, so ##T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m k_\mathrm{B} d^2} \left(\frac{N}{L} \right)^2 = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m k_\mathrm{B}}##.

My problem comes when trying an alternate approach, by considering the system at ##T = T_\mathrm{F}##. In this case, one can calculate the average number of electrons using
$$
N = \int_0^\infty \bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} g(E) dE
$$
##\mu(T_\mathrm{F}) = 0##, so the equation becomes
$$
\begin{align*}
N &= \frac{L \sqrt{2m}}{\pi \hbar} \int_0^\infty \frac{E^{-1/2}}{e^{E / (k_\mathrm{B} T_\mathrm{F})} + 1} dE \\
&= \frac{L \sqrt{2m}}{\pi \hbar} \left(1 - \sqrt{2} \right) \sqrt{\pi } \zeta \left(1/2\right) \sqrt{k_\mathrm{B} T_\mathrm{F}}
\end{align*}
$$
from which I recover
$$
T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{\left(2 \sqrt{2}+3\right) \pi \hbar ^2}{2 \zeta^2 \left(1/2\right) k_\mathrm{B} m} \left(\frac{N}{L} \right)^2
$$
Comparing with the approach above, this result is ##\approx 3.5## times bigger.

I am confident of the first result above (and it is the same as I found in some on-line and off-line resources) and would appreciate some help in figuring out what is wrong in the second approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think ##\mu(T_\mathrm{F}) = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
TSny said:
I don't think ##\mu(T_\mathrm{F}) = 0##.
That was my initial thought when a saw that solution from a student. We were confused by fig. 7.16 in Schroeder's textbook, which shows the chemical potential go to 0 at ##T_\mathrm{F}##. Looking more closely, that figure is related to problem 7.23 for a the case where ##\mu = 0## at ##T = T_\mathrm{F}##. I guess this is just a special case.

Thanks!
 
It is interesting that for the 3d case, ##\mu \approx 0## at the Fermi temperature. See second page of http://young.physics.ucsc.edu/112/mu_T.pdf . In the graph, you can see that ##\mu= 0## at a temperature slightly less than the Fermi temperature. See also equation (9) on that page.

##\mu## at a given temperature is whatever it has to be in order for ## N = \int_0^\infty \bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} g(E) dE ## to hold. For the 1d case, ##\mu## is apparently not close to zero at the Fermi temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
This is indeed interesting. If I calculate
$$
N = \int_0^\infty \bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} g(E) dE
$$
for a 3D Fermi gas with ##\mu=0## and solve for the temperature ##T_0##, I find
$$
\frac{T_0}{T_\mathrm{F}} = 2 \left( \frac{2 \sqrt{2}+3}{\pi }\right)^{1/3} \left(\frac{2}{3 \zeta \left(3/2 \right)}\right)^{2/3} \approx 0.988734
$$
confirming that the temperature for which ##\mu=0## is almost the Fermi temperature.
 
Yes. Your result agrees with equation (9) of the link. That's nice.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K