MHB Is there a formula that gives me the RREF of a matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rorschach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Matrix
Rorschach
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Is there formula that transforms a matrix into its row-reduced echelon form?

I know I can get there by row operations. But isn't there be like a formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One possibility is to write $E_A = E_r E_{r-1} \cdots E_1 A$ where $E_A$ is the RREF of $A$ and $E_1,\ldots,E_r$ are the matrices corresponding to the elementary row operations that transform $A$ into $E_A$. Of course, the particular sequence of row operations depends on $A$, so I don't know if this is what you are looking for, but at least it gives you an equality between matrices.
 
Hi Rorschach,

It may seem a bit lame, but a formula to find the RREF of a matrix $A$ would be $\operatorname{rref}(A)$.
The function $\operatorname{rref}$ is supported by for instance the numerical programs MatLab and Octave, while Mathematica has named the function $\operatorname{RowReduce}$.
It can be calculated with the usual Gaussian elimination, but that is not necessarily the best way to do it. The reason is that Gaussian elimination is sensitive to rounding errors. Btw, in practice we generally wouldn't use RREF. Instead we would use a solution method that is the most appropriate for the actual problem that we want to solve.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top