Is there a major difference between 'Fundamentals of Physics' editions?

  • Context: Classical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 761155
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Textbook
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between various editions of the "Fundamentals of Physics" textbook, specifically the 12th and 10th editions. Participants note that while problem sets may change, the core text remains largely consistent. Users recommend earlier editions, such as the 5th edition, for their clarity and fewer errors compared to newer editions. Additionally, the 2nd edition of Goldstein is highlighted as superior to the 3rd edition due to issues with non-holonomic constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with physics textbooks, particularly "Fundamentals of Physics"
  • Understanding of non-holonomic constraints in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of textbook publishing practices and edition revisions
  • Access to online resources for free educational materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between the 10th and 12th editions of "Fundamentals of Physics"
  • Explore the 2nd edition of Goldstein for its treatment of non-holonomic constraints
  • Investigate the availability of older editions of "Fundamentals of Physics" and similar textbooks
  • Look into online resources for free physics textbooks, such as Haliday, Resnik, and Krane
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and physics enthusiasts seeking affordable and effective study materials, particularly those comparing different editions of physics textbooks.

member 761155
I am having a hard time finding a reasonably priced paperback or hardcover copy of the Fundamentals of Physics 12th edition for studying. So I am wondering if there is a huge difference in the older 10th edition which I can find more easily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, problems change, but the text remains “constant”. I have not looked at the specific editions you listed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
Just get the earlier editions titled Physics. I have 5th edition, pdfs exist online or you can get a hardcover volume 1 and 2 used from amazon. It's superior to the bloat that is FoP.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilsarmstron
Higher editions sell more new books, and shuffle the problems. A publishing contact generally gives the Publisher the right to demand a new edition. Jackson 2 is better than Jackson 3. Each new edition of Arfken went downhill.
 
Somehow even with the new editions of Arfken they still haven't sorted out all the math errors that drove me crazy a few semesters ago. It's in my opinion not a good book.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Higher editions sell more new books, and shuffle the problems. A publishing contact generally gives the Publisher the right to demand a new edition. Jackson 2 is better than Jackson 3. Each new edition of Arfken went downhill.
I have the third edition of Goldstein but I have heard that the 2nd edition is much better. Users have stated on this forum that there are problems with the treatment of non-holonomic constraints in the 3rd edition.
 
I got Young and Freedman for £5 in the charity shop (so like $6.70)...
you can get Haliday, Resnik and Krane free online
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K