Classical Is there a major difference between 'Fundamentals of Physics' editions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 761155
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Textbook
AI Thread Summary
Finding a reasonably priced copy of "Fundamentals of Physics" 12th edition can be challenging, leading to inquiries about the differences with the older 10th edition. While problems may change, the core text remains largely consistent. Some users recommend earlier editions, such as the 5th edition, which are available as used hardcover volumes or PDFs online, often considered superior to newer editions due to excessive content. Concerns about the quality of newer editions are noted, with specific mentions that Jackson's 2nd edition is preferred over the 3rd, and that each new edition of Arfken has deteriorated in quality, still containing unresolved mathematical errors. Additionally, the 3rd edition of Goldstein is criticized for its treatment of non-holonomic constraints, with users suggesting the 2nd edition is better. Affordable alternatives like Young and Freedman are also highlighted, along with the availability of Haliday, Resnik, and Krane for free online.
member 761155
I am having a hard time finding a reasonably priced paperback or hardcover copy of the Fundamentals of Physics 12th edition for studying. So I am wondering if there is a huge difference in the older 10th edition which I can find more easily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, problems change, but the text remains “constant”. I have not looked at the specific editions you listed.
 
Just get the earlier editions titled Physics. I have 5th edition, pdfs exist online or you can get a hardcover volume 1 and 2 used from amazon. It's superior to the bloat that is FoP.
 
  • Like
Likes neilsarmstron
Higher editions sell more new books, and shuffle the problems. A publishing contact generally gives the Publisher the right to demand a new edition. Jackson 2 is better than Jackson 3. Each new edition of Arfken went downhill.
 
Somehow even with the new editions of Arfken they still haven't sorted out all the math errors that drove me crazy a few semesters ago. It's in my opinion not a good book.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Higher editions sell more new books, and shuffle the problems. A publishing contact generally gives the Publisher the right to demand a new edition. Jackson 2 is better than Jackson 3. Each new edition of Arfken went downhill.
I have the third edition of Goldstein but I have heard that the 2nd edition is much better. Users have stated on this forum that there are problems with the treatment of non-holonomic constraints in the 3rd edition.
 
I got Young and Freedman for £5 in the charity shop (so like $6.70)...
you can get Haliday, Resnik and Krane free online
 
Back
Top