Is there a proof about angular momentum conservation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Angular momentum is conserved in a closed system, as demonstrated through classical mechanics principles. The discussion highlights that when two points exert equal and opposite forces on each other, the angular momenta imparted are equal and opposite, resulting in a net angular momentum of zero. This conservation is further supported by Noether's theorem, which states that if a system is invariant under rotation, angular momentum remains conserved. The mathematical foundation relies on Newton's laws, specifically the relationship between torque and the rate of change of angular momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically cross products
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics concepts, including torque and angular momentum
  • Basic comprehension of Noether's theorem and its implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of angular momentum conservation from Newton's laws
  • Explore Noether's theorem and its applications in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between torque and angular momentum in various physical systems
  • Investigate real-world examples of angular momentum conservation in closed systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics and the principles of conservation laws in physical systems.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
Angular momentum and it conservation.
Relevant Equations
L = rp
Angular momentum can be exchanged between objects in a closed system, but total angular momentum before and after an exchange remains constant (is conserved).
There is a proof about this conservation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider two points in the system interacting, i.e. exerting a force on each other. If we accept the rule that action and reaction are equal and opposite then these forces are equal and opposite, ##\vec F## and ##-\vec F##, and lie in the same line.
If the forces exist for time dt then the points impart equal and opposite momenta, ##\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec Fdt##.
If we consider all this in respect of some axis O, and a vector from there to the line of action of the forces is ##\vec r##, then the angular momenta they impart on each other are ##\vec r\times\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec r\times\vec Fdt##.
Hence the sum of the imparted angular momenta is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist, archaic and FactChecker
ORF said:
Hi,

A more abstract (and fancy) proof is given by Noether's theorem: if your system is invariant under rotation, angular momentum is conserved

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem#Applications

Regards,
ORF
Wow, this was scarry, i was just reading this in French Newtonian mechanics right now about this, like ten minutes ago kkkk unfortunately I don't understand much about these concepts of symmetry. but i will save it thx
 
haruspex said:
Consider two points in the system interacting, i.e. exerting a force on each other. If we accept the rule that action and reaction are equal and opposite then these forces are equal and opposite, ##\vec F## and ##-\vec F##, and lie in the same line.
If the forces exist for time dt then the points impart equal and opposite momenta, ##\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec Fdt##.
If we consider all this in respect of some axis O, and a vector from there to the line of action of the forces is ##\vec r##, then the angular momenta they impart on each other are ##\vec r\times\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec r\times\vec Fdt##.
Hence the sum of the imparted angular momenta is zero.
You are using a theorem of classical Newtonian mechanics here, namely that the sum of torques ##\sum \vec{T_i}=\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}## equals the rate of change of angular momentum L. It is a theorem in the sense that it can be proved from Newton's laws.
 
Delta2 said:
You are using a theorem of classical Newtonian mechanics here, namely that the sum of torques ##\sum \vec{T_i}=\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}## equals the rate of change of angular momentum L. It is a theorem in the sense that it can be proved from Newton's laws.
Start from Newton's second law ##\vec F = m \vec a ##.
By definition, the angular momentum is ##\vec L = \vec r \times\vec p= m \vec r \times\vec v##. (1)
(x means cross product)
## \vec r ## is the position vector, ## \vec v ## is the velocity ## \vec v = \dot {\vec r}##
##\vec a ## is the acceleration,##\dot{\vec v}= \vec a##.
The force is ##\vec F =m\vec a## .
The torque is ##\vec\tau=\vec r \times \vec F##
Take the time derivative of eq. (1)
##\dot{\vec L }= m \left (\dot{\vec r}\times \vec v + \vec r \times \dot{\vec v}\right)##
##\dot{\vec r}\times \vec v ==0##
so
##\dot{\vec L }= m \vec r \times \dot{\vec v}= m \vec r \times \vec a = \vec r \times\vec F= \vec \tau##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
935
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K