Is there a proof about angular momentum conservation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of angular momentum, particularly within closed systems where angular momentum can be exchanged between objects. Participants are exploring proofs and theoretical underpinnings of this principle.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various approaches to understanding angular momentum conservation, including a classical mechanics perspective involving forces and torques, as well as a reference to Noether's theorem regarding symmetries in physical systems. Questions about the implications of these theories and their proofs are also raised.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and references to established theorems. Some have expressed uncertainty about the concepts discussed, indicating a need for further clarification. There is no explicit consensus on a singular proof, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention challenges in understanding the abstract concepts related to symmetry and conservation laws, suggesting a potential gap in foundational knowledge that may affect their engagement with the topic.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
Angular momentum and it conservation.
Relevant Equations
L = rp
Angular momentum can be exchanged between objects in a closed system, but total angular momentum before and after an exchange remains constant (is conserved).
There is a proof about this conservation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider two points in the system interacting, i.e. exerting a force on each other. If we accept the rule that action and reaction are equal and opposite then these forces are equal and opposite, ##\vec F## and ##-\vec F##, and lie in the same line.
If the forces exist for time dt then the points impart equal and opposite momenta, ##\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec Fdt##.
If we consider all this in respect of some axis O, and a vector from there to the line of action of the forces is ##\vec r##, then the angular momenta they impart on each other are ##\vec r\times\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec r\times\vec Fdt##.
Hence the sum of the imparted angular momenta is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist, archaic and FactChecker
ORF said:
Hi,

A more abstract (and fancy) proof is given by Noether's theorem: if your system is invariant under rotation, angular momentum is conserved

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem#Applications

Regards,
ORF
Wow, this was scarry, i was just reading this in French Newtonian mechanics right now about this, like ten minutes ago kkkk unfortunately I don't understand much about these concepts of symmetry. but i will save it thx
 
haruspex said:
Consider two points in the system interacting, i.e. exerting a force on each other. If we accept the rule that action and reaction are equal and opposite then these forces are equal and opposite, ##\vec F## and ##-\vec F##, and lie in the same line.
If the forces exist for time dt then the points impart equal and opposite momenta, ##\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec Fdt##.
If we consider all this in respect of some axis O, and a vector from there to the line of action of the forces is ##\vec r##, then the angular momenta they impart on each other are ##\vec r\times\vec Fdt## and ##-\vec r\times\vec Fdt##.
Hence the sum of the imparted angular momenta is zero.
You are using a theorem of classical Newtonian mechanics here, namely that the sum of torques ##\sum \vec{T_i}=\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}## equals the rate of change of angular momentum L. It is a theorem in the sense that it can be proved from Newton's laws.
 
Delta2 said:
You are using a theorem of classical Newtonian mechanics here, namely that the sum of torques ##\sum \vec{T_i}=\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}## equals the rate of change of angular momentum L. It is a theorem in the sense that it can be proved from Newton's laws.
Start from Newton's second law ##\vec F = m \vec a ##.
By definition, the angular momentum is ##\vec L = \vec r \times\vec p= m \vec r \times\vec v##. (1)
(x means cross product)
## \vec r ## is the position vector, ## \vec v ## is the velocity ## \vec v = \dot {\vec r}##
##\vec a ## is the acceleration,##\dot{\vec v}= \vec a##.
The force is ##\vec F =m\vec a## .
The torque is ##\vec\tau=\vec r \times \vec F##
Take the time derivative of eq. (1)
##\dot{\vec L }= m \left (\dot{\vec r}\times \vec v + \vec r \times \dot{\vec v}\right)##
##\dot{\vec r}\times \vec v ==0##
so
##\dot{\vec L }= m \vec r \times \dot{\vec v}= m \vec r \times \vec a = \vec r \times\vec F= \vec \tau##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K