Is There a Ring Homomorphism for All Unital Rings in Evaluation Homomorphism?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Monobrow
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the existence of a ring homomorphism for unital rings in the context of evaluation homomorphisms, particularly focusing on whether this holds for noncommutative rings as it does for commutative ones. Participants explore the implications of polynomial rings and their properties in both commutative and noncommutative settings.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a ring homomorphism exists for any unital ring, suggesting that they have only seen this for fields.
  • Another participant confirms that the evaluation homomorphism is true for commutative unital rings, citing a specific theorem from a textbook.
  • A different participant argues against the existence of such a homomorphism in noncommutative settings, using the example of the Weyl algebra to illustrate the incompatibility of polynomial rings' inherent commutativity with noncommutative rings.
  • This participant also notes that while the property fails for polynomial rings in noncommutative settings, it holds for free algebras where the variables do not commute.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the clarification regarding the noncommutative case and acknowledges the reasoning provided.
  • Another participant raises a caution about defining polynomial rings and evaluations in noncommutative contexts, mentioning the necessity of considering left and right evaluations due to potential noncommutativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus. There are competing views regarding the existence of evaluation homomorphisms in noncommutative rings, with some arguing for their nonexistence and others discussing the complexities involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful definitions when dealing with polynomial rings in noncommutative settings, particularly regarding the assumptions about the center of the ring and the implications for evaluation methods.

Monobrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Is it true that for any unital ring (not necessarily commutative), that we have a ring homomorphism for all a = (a_1, ...,a_n)[itex]\in R, from R[X_1,...,X_n] → R given by sending a polynomial f to f(a)? I have only ever seen this for fields. I cannot think of any possible reason it would be false for general rings but I just wanted to make sure.[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is not true.

Take for example the Weyl-algebra. This is [itex]W=\mathbb{Z}<a,b> / (ab-ba-1)[/itex]. So it is the algebra generated by a and b such that [a,b]=1.

Anyway, consider the polynomial ring [itex]W[X,Y][/itex]. There does not exist a homomorphism T such that T(X)=a and T(Y)=b.

Indeed. If it would exist, then T(XY)=ab and T(YX)=ba. But XY=YX, and thus ab=ba. So it fails.

The problem is that polynomial rings have an inherent commutativity which is not compatible with noncommutative rings.

Very related to your question is the question about free objects of commutative R-algebras (with R commutative). The polynomial ring is a free object for this algebra. But as soon as you allow the algebras (and R) to be noncommutative, then it is not a free object anymore.

The free object in such algebra is given by [itex]R<X_1,X_2,...,X_n>[/itex]. These are polynomial rings in which the [itex]X_i[/itex] and the [itex]X_j[/itex] do not commute. In fact, there are no relations between the [itex]X_i[/itex] and the [itex]X_j[/itex] at all.

The property you mention in the OP fails for polynomial rings in noncommutative setting, but it holds for the free algebra I mentioned above (in commutative or noncommutative setting).
 
Thanks a lot. It was the non-commutative case I was worried about and it's good to see why it doesn't work.
 
I think you need to be a little careful even to define polynomial rings and evaluation over non commutative R. I believe one usually assumes R[X1,...,Xn] is a ring in which the elements Xi are in the center. Then, given an element a of R which may not commute with the coefficients of a given polynomial f, one has two evaluations of f at a, left evaluation and right evaluation. Nonetheless these two maps are useful; in particular there is a left and a right division algorithm, and two remainder theorems, allowing you to compute the remainder of both left and right division of f by (X-a).

This is all discussed on pages 37-41 of Fundamental Concepts of Higher Algebra by A.A.Albert.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K