Is There a Way to Regularize Euler Products on Primes?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the regularization of Euler products on primes, specifically addressing the convergence issues of the Riemann zeta function, ζ(s), when Re(s) > 1. It highlights the logarithmic transformation of the Euler product representation, leading to the differentiation that results in the zeta-regularized sum on primes. The conversation references the work of Munoz Garcia and Perez Marco, particularly their paper titled 'Super Regularization of Infinite Products', which provides insights into prime regularization techniques. A link to the preprint PDF is also shared for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann zeta function, ζ(s)
  • Familiarity with Euler products and their convergence properties
  • Knowledge of logarithmic differentiation in complex analysis
  • Basic grasp of prime number theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Read 'Super Regularization of Infinite Products' by Munoz Garcia and Perez Marco
  • Explore advanced topics in analytic number theory
  • Study the implications of zeta function regularization techniques
  • Investigate the applications of Euler products in modern mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and researchers interested in analytic number theory and the regularization of infinite products, particularly those focusing on prime number distributions.

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
although is not valid in general (since an Euler product usually converges only when Re(s) >1)

[tex]\frac{ d \zeta(1/2)}{\zeta (1/2)}= -\sum_{p} log(p)(1-p^{1/2}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, this is simply by taking logarithms on either side of the Euler product representation to get,

[tex]\log{\zeta(s)} = -\sum_{p} \log{(1 - p^{-s})}[/tex]

where [itex]p[/tex] is the set of primes.<br /> Differentiating then gives,<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)} = -\sum_{p} (p^{s} - 1)^{-1} \log{p}[/tex]<br /> <br /> This gives the zeta-regularized sum (and hence product) on primes (which looks curious as it is, unless special values of [itex]s[/tex] are used), but generally its more convenient to consider,<br /> <br /> [tex]\prod_{n} \lambda_{n} = \exp{-\zeta_{\lambda}'(0)}[/tex]<br /> <br /> for a zeta function defined on a sequence [itex](\lambda_{n})_{n \geq 1}[/tex].<br /> <br /> If its a prime regularization you're after, look for this paper by Munoz Garcia and Perez Marco called 'Super Regularization of Infinite Products'.<br /> <br /> Never mind, here's the link to the preprint pdf-<br /> http://inc.web.ihes.fr/prepub/PREPRINTS/M03/M03-52.pdf[/itex][/itex][/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K