Is there a Whole Number Multiple of Pi Closest to a Whole Number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter danyo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the question of whether a whole number multiple of π can be found that is closest to a whole number. It is established that no single whole number multiple exists that equals an integer, as π is irrational. However, according to Kronecker's density theorem, multiples of π can be made arbitrarily close to integers. The conversation also highlights specific approximations of π, such as 22/7 and 333/106, which yield values very close to whole numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irrational numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with Kronecker's density theorem
  • Basic knowledge of continued fractions
  • Experience with Pell's equation for approximating square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Kronecker's density theorem and its implications for irrational numbers
  • Explore continued fractions and their role in approximating irrational numbers
  • Investigate Pell's equation and its applications in number theory
  • Examine numerical methods for finding close approximations of π
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of irrational numbers and their approximations.

danyo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

About 15 minutes ago I came up with a problem... What whole number multiple of pi would result in a number closest to a whole number?

Does a single whole number multiple exist, and can we... prove it?


Thanks for help in advance!


-Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danyo said:
Hi everyone,

About 15 minutes ago I came up with a problem... What whole number multiple of pi would result in a number closest to a whole number?

Does a single whole number multiple exist, and can we... prove it?


Thanks for help in advance!


-Daniel

There is no solution to that problem. The thing is that we can get n\pi as close to an integer as we like. This is basically Kroneckers density theorem. Of course, a nonzero multiple of \pi can never actually equal an integer (since that would imply that \pi is rational), but it can be arbitrary close.

The number \pi is not special here, it works for any irrational number.
 
micromass said:
There is no solution to that problem. The thing is that we can get n\pi as close to an integer as we like. This is basically Kroneckers density theorem.

Thank you for the reply, micromass! I was not familiar with Kronecker's density theorem, but its logic clarifies this problem. I wonder if there's any pattern in what integers n would bring us closer to a whole number...

Ah, well there goes my bedtime tonight! Thanks for the direction :D
 
danyo said:
I wonder if there's any pattern in what integers n would bring us closer to a whole number...
That is a much more interesting problem (to me). For certain types of irrational numbers, there is indeed a pattern (you can check out Pell's equation and Continued Fractions to find ways to very closely approximate square roots).

However, here is how you would find such integers for pi. We know the close approximation of 22/7 for pi. Then we have:

22/7≈pi
22≈7pi

And verifying, we have 7*pi≈21.99114858

Another close approximation is 333/106:

333/106≈pi
333≈106pi

and 106pi≈333.0088213...

I hope this proves useful!
 
You might also be interested in the following thread from the wu riddle site;

"Say I am given a number X = A*[sqrt]2 + B*[pi], where A and B are integers.
Given X, how can you find A and B, without using brute force?"

It comes with a long discussion.

see
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi
 
I ran a quick computer program just for interest sake.

78256779
103767361
129277943
131002976
156513558
180299107
182024140
183749173
205809689
207534722
209259755
233045304
234770337
236495370
258555886
260280919
262005952

Those numbers if multiplied with pi will give you a number so close to a integer that the decimal part can't fit in a double precision floating point. As stated above you can't actually get a integer from multiplying a integer with pi (except 0)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
888
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K