Is there an order-embedding from \mathbb Z^\infty to \mathbb Q for my paper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter heptheorist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
An explicit order-embedding from \mathbb Z^\infty to \mathbb Q is proposed using a function f that maps integers to rational numbers in the interval (0,1). The function assigns specific values to integers, allowing for the ordering of individual "letters" and creating spaces between them. The embedding g is defined as a sum that incorporates the function f and the calculated spaces, ensuring the result remains rational. The approach is confirmed to be effective for the intended purpose of the paper. This method successfully demonstrates the desired order-preserving function.
heptheorist
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For a paper I'm writing: Does anyone know of an explicit order-embedding (i.e. an order-preserving function) from \mathbb Z^\infty, the direct sum of infinitely many copies of the integers ordered lexicographically, to \mathbb Q, the rationals? It need not be a surjective embedding, but that would be a plus (obviously the two sets are order isomorphic).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about this?

First, define a function f: \mathbb Z \to (0,1) \cap \mathbb Q, something like
0 -> 1/2
n -> 1 - 1/(2n) for i>0
n -> -1/(2n) for i<0

This allows to order individual "letters" (I like the analogy, I will keep it).
Use this function to evaluate the position of all 1-letter-words. In addition, the space to the next word can be used for all words beginning with this letter, in a similar way (0,1) was used for 1-letter-words. Let d(n)=f(n+1)-f(n) be this space.

Now, let g: \mathbb Z^\infty \to \mathbb Q with
g(a_0,a_1,...) = \sum_i \left(f(a_i) \prod_{n=0}^{i-1} d(a_n)\right)

I hope this works...
As the sum adds up a finite number of non-zero values, the result is rational.
 
This is a great idea, exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
947
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
13K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
882
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
14K