- #26

- 706

- 2

Fallacy? But wecanget from point A to point B.

So, we have an observation 'cover the infinite infinitesimal gaps from A to B', and we have a mathematical solution for it (calculus).

What exactly is the problem here? Sounds like you're tilting at windmills.

Observation/description hardly counts as adequate explanation(even if it's utilized into a rigged mathematical framework). Fact of the matter is, motion is assumed(and observed as you say), not understood or explained.

To the OP - it's unreasonable to ask a philosophical question and expect to get anything but philosophical feedback.