I Is this a Killing vector field?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying Killing vector fields in a specific gravitational wave spacetime. An obvious Killing vector field is identified as ##\partial/\partial w##, while a proposed form for additional Killing vector fields is given as $$X = xf(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial w} + p(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$. The approach to verify if ##X## is a Killing vector involves using the condition ##L_X g = 0##, which leads to a series of equations that need to be satisfied. The conversation suggests that finding conditions on the functions ##f(u)## and ##p(u)## is essential for ##X## to qualify as a Killing vector field. The discussion concludes with uncertainty about the arrangement of terms in the derived equations, indicating further exploration is needed.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
There is a gravitational wave spacetime described by$$g = a(u) (x^2-y^2)du^2 + 2du dw + dx^2 + dy^2$$There is one obvious Killing vector field, ##\partial/\partial w \equiv \partial_w##. To find some more, it's suggested to try:$$X = xf(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial w} + p(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$In principle, you could compute the connection coefficients, write out Killing's equation, and verify each component. But that is generally tedious, so instead I thought it may be easier to use directly the condition ##L_X g = 0##. Explicitly,\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= L_{xf \partial_w} g + L_{p \partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ xf L_{\partial_w} g + d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g \right] + \left[ p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g\right] \\
&= d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g \\ \\
&= (fdx + xf'(u) du) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + p'(u) du \wedge i_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}
where I used ##L_{\partial_w} g = 0##. Here ##i_{\partial_w} g## and ##i_{\partial_x} g## are one-forms with components \begin{align*}
(i_{\partial_w} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{w\alpha} = g_{wu} \delta^u_{\alpha} \\
(i_{\partial_x} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{x\alpha} = g_{xx} \delta^x_{\alpha}
\end{align*}Any ideas how to find conditions on ##f(u)## and ##p(u)## for ##X## to be Killing? Maybe just a case of expanding out the terms, which is probably a good idea to try...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fact, you can re-write it as\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= (f(u)g_{uu} - p'(u) g_{xx}) dx \wedge du + pL_{\partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du + p L_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}So you need to arrange$$L_{\partial_x} g = - \frac{1}{p(u)} \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du$$...? That can't be it...
 
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...