I Is this a Killing vector field?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying Killing vector fields in a specific gravitational wave spacetime. An obvious Killing vector field is identified as ##\partial/\partial w##, while a proposed form for additional Killing vector fields is given as $$X = xf(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial w} + p(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$. The approach to verify if ##X## is a Killing vector involves using the condition ##L_X g = 0##, which leads to a series of equations that need to be satisfied. The conversation suggests that finding conditions on the functions ##f(u)## and ##p(u)## is essential for ##X## to qualify as a Killing vector field. The discussion concludes with uncertainty about the arrangement of terms in the derived equations, indicating further exploration is needed.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
There is a gravitational wave spacetime described by$$g = a(u) (x^2-y^2)du^2 + 2du dw + dx^2 + dy^2$$There is one obvious Killing vector field, ##\partial/\partial w \equiv \partial_w##. To find some more, it's suggested to try:$$X = xf(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial w} + p(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$In principle, you could compute the connection coefficients, write out Killing's equation, and verify each component. But that is generally tedious, so instead I thought it may be easier to use directly the condition ##L_X g = 0##. Explicitly,\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= L_{xf \partial_w} g + L_{p \partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ xf L_{\partial_w} g + d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g \right] + \left[ p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g\right] \\
&= d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g \\ \\
&= (fdx + xf'(u) du) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + p'(u) du \wedge i_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}
where I used ##L_{\partial_w} g = 0##. Here ##i_{\partial_w} g## and ##i_{\partial_x} g## are one-forms with components \begin{align*}
(i_{\partial_w} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{w\alpha} = g_{wu} \delta^u_{\alpha} \\
(i_{\partial_x} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{x\alpha} = g_{xx} \delta^x_{\alpha}
\end{align*}Any ideas how to find conditions on ##f(u)## and ##p(u)## for ##X## to be Killing? Maybe just a case of expanding out the terms, which is probably a good idea to try...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fact, you can re-write it as\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= (f(u)g_{uu} - p'(u) g_{xx}) dx \wedge du + pL_{\partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du + p L_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}So you need to arrange$$L_{\partial_x} g = - \frac{1}{p(u)} \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du$$...? That can't be it...
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
869
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K