I Is this a Killing vector field?

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
There is a gravitational wave spacetime described by$$g = a(u) (x^2-y^2)du^2 + 2du dw + dx^2 + dy^2$$There is one obvious Killing vector field, ##\partial/\partial w \equiv \partial_w##. To find some more, it's suggested to try:$$X = xf(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial w} + p(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$In principle, you could compute the connection coefficients, write out Killing's equation, and verify each component. But that is generally tedious, so instead I thought it may be easier to use directly the condition ##L_X g = 0##. Explicitly,\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= L_{xf \partial_w} g + L_{p \partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ xf L_{\partial_w} g + d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g \right] + \left[ p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g\right] \\
&= d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g \\ \\
&= (fdx + xf'(u) du) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + p'(u) du \wedge i_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}
where I used ##L_{\partial_w} g = 0##. Here ##i_{\partial_w} g## and ##i_{\partial_x} g## are one-forms with components \begin{align*}
(i_{\partial_w} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{w\alpha} = g_{wu} \delta^u_{\alpha} \\
(i_{\partial_x} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{x\alpha} = g_{xx} \delta^x_{\alpha}
\end{align*}Any ideas how to find conditions on ##f(u)## and ##p(u)## for ##X## to be Killing? Maybe just a case of expanding out the terms, which is probably a good idea to try...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fact, you can re-write it as\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= (f(u)g_{uu} - p'(u) g_{xx}) dx \wedge du + pL_{\partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du + p L_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}So you need to arrange$$L_{\partial_x} g = - \frac{1}{p(u)} \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du$$...? That can't be it...
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top