Is this a known result? (hypergeometric function at special values)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nrqed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and identities of hypergeometric functions, specifically the evaluation of the hypergeometric function $_2F_1$ at certain special values. Participants explore the validity of a conjectured identity related to graph counting problems and seek references for known results and identities involving generalized hypergeometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have verified that for positive integers N, the identity $$ \,_2F_1 [\frac{1}{2},-N;-N+ \frac{1}{2} ; z=1] = \frac{4^N (N!)^2}{(2N)!} $$ holds, but seeks proof and references.
  • Another participant suggests that the result can be derived using identities from the DLMF, specifically referencing equation 15.4.24 and various Pochhammer symbol identities.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the reference to the DLMF and acknowledges a newfound understanding of defining certain Pochhammer symbols.
  • One participant mentions obtaining conjectured identities involving generalized hypergeometric functions $_pF_q$ and inquires about tables of known relations for these functions.
  • Another participant recommends additional resources, including Wolfram Mathworld and Erdelyi's "Higher Transcendental Functions," for further exploration of hypergeometric function identities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the utility of the DLMF for deriving identities related to hypergeometric functions, but the discussion includes multiple conjectured identities and lacks consensus on their validity or existence in literature.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the availability of certain identities in literature and the existence of comprehensive tables for generalized hypergeometric functions.

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
Through some calculations in a graph counting problem, I have checked that for many values of N (a positive integer), the following is true:

$$ \,_2F_1 [\frac{1}{2},-N;-N+ \frac{1}{2} ; z=1] = \frac{4^N (N!)^2}{(2N)!} $$
I would like to prove that this correct for arbitrary N, but I cannot find anywhere an expression for this particular combination of parameters (note that ##c-a-b=0##, which is very unfortunate as it prevents the use of one well known identity). I have checked Abramowitz and Stegun and several other sources. No luck. Does anyone know if this is true or if they have some good source of identities to recommend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a result that follows very easily using identities available at the DLMF:
https://dlmf.nist.gov/

The starting point is 15.4.24 (http://dlmf.nist.gov/15.4.E24)
## _2F_1\left(-N,b;c;1\right)=\frac{{\left(c-b\right)_{N}}}{{\left(c\right)_{N}}} ##
where the Pochhammer symbols are ##(a)_N = \Gamma(a+N)/\Gamma(a)##. You then use a few identities for those symbols to get your result. I used 5.2.7, 5.2.6, 5.2.5, 5.5.5 and 5.4.6 (see https://dlmf.nist.gov/5) .

jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, nrqed and DrClaude
jasonRF said:
It is a result that follows very easily using identities available at the DLMF:
https://dlmf.nist.gov/

The starting point is 15.4.24 (http://dlmf.nist.gov/15.4.E24)
## _2F_1\left(-N,b;c;1\right)=\frac{{\left(c-b\right)_{N}}}{{\left(c\right)_{N}}} ##
where the Pochhammer symbols are ##(a)_N = \Gamma(a+N)/\Gamma(a)##. You then use a few identities for those symbols to get your result. I used 5.2.7, 5.2.6, 5.2.5, 5.5.5 and 5.4.6 (see https://dlmf.nist.gov/5) .

jason
Wow,

Thank you so much! I had seen the equation given in 15.4.24 but I had not realized that one could define ##(-n)_n## as is given in 5.2.7.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
jasonRF said:
It is a result that follows very easily using identities available at the DLMF:
https://dlmf.nist.gov/

The starting point is 15.4.24 (http://dlmf.nist.gov/15.4.E24)
## _2F_1\left(-N,b;c;1\right)=\frac{{\left(c-b\right)_{N}}}{{\left(c\right)_{N}}} ##
where the Pochhammer symbols are ##(a)_N = \Gamma(a+N)/\Gamma(a)##. You then use a few identities for those symbols to get your result. I used 5.2.7, 5.2.6, 5.2.5, 5.5.5 and 5.4.6 (see https://dlmf.nist.gov/5) .

jason
Hello Jason,

I am now obtaining many conjectured identities that I cannot find in the literature. These involve generalized hypergeometric functions ##\,_pF_q## with ## p > 2## and ## q > 1##. For example I get a relation between ##\,_4F_3## and ##\,_3 F_2 ## for a certain choice of parameters (my relation involves three different positive integers).

Do you know if there are tables of known relations between generalized hypergeometric functions? I have seen a couple on the Wikipedia page but that's all.

Thank you!
 
Besides DLMF, I would check Wolfram Mathworld online. In terms of books, Erdelyi's "Higher Transcendental Functions" volumes 1-3 are legally available online:
http://numerical.recipes/oldverswitcher.html
They probably have a few relations.

I suspect that you don't have access to a library these days, but if you do then there may be other books to look at. For example, Yudell Luke's books "The special functions and their approximations" vol 1-2, and "mathematical functions and their approximations" should have some interesting information.

jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nrqed
jasonRF said:
Besides DLMF, I would check Wolfram Mathworld online. In terms of books, Erdelyi's "Higher Transcendental Functions" volumes 1-3 are legally available online:
http://numerical.recipes/oldverswitcher.html
They probably have a few relations.

I suspect that you don't have access to a library these days, but if you do then there may be other books to look at. For example, Yudell Luke's books "The special functions and their approximations" vol 1-2, and "mathematical functions and their approximations" should have some interesting information.

jason
Thank you again, Jason. I appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K