MHB Is this a well-formed set-builder notation?

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Are these three sets equivalent?

$$A=\left\{(x,y):x,y\in\Bbb{R},y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$
$$B=\left\{x,y\in\Bbb{R}:y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$
$$C=\left\{(x,y)\in\Bbb{R}^2:y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$

I am thinking that $A$ and $C$ are, but not $B$ as it might be ambigious as to which dimension it is in, i.e it could be in $\Bbb{R}^3$, where any value of $z$ will satisfy. Am I right? :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
Are these three sets equivalent?

$$A=\left\{(x,y):x,y\in\Bbb{R},y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$
$$B=\left\{x,y\in\Bbb{R}:y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$
$$C=\left\{(x,y)\in\Bbb{R}^2:y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$

I am thinking that $A$ and $C$ are, but not $B$ as it might be ambigious as to which dimension it is in, i.e it could be in $\Bbb{R}^3$, where any value of $z$ will satisfy. Am I right? :D

(Wave) Happy new year! (Party)

Yes, you are right.

At the set $A$ we have the ordered pair $(x,y)$ such that $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$ so it is meant that $(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2$.
The set $B$ isn't equivalent to the other two because of the fact that at the sets $A,C$ we consider an ordered pair and and so the order in which the objects appear is significant, but for the set $B$ this doesn't hold.
For example, if we are given $x=5$, $y=1$, we check if $(5,1) \in A$ that does not hold since it doesn't hold that $1 \geq 5^2-1$.
For the set $B$ we check if $y \geq x^2-1$ which holds by taking $y=5$ and $x=1$.
 
Last edited:
Rido12 said:
Are these three sets equivalent?
Sets can be equal, and definitions can be equivalent.

Rido12 said:
$$B=\left\{x,y\in\Bbb{R}:y\ge x^2-1\right\}$$
This is not a well-formed set-builder notation. A well-formed notation has the form $\{x\mid P(x)\}$, $\{x\in A\mid P(x)\}$ or $\{f(x)\mid P(x)\}$, but not $\{x,y\in A\mid P(x,y)\}$.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top