Is This Carbon Monoxide Calculation Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fishingaxe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the amount of carbon monoxide (CO) required to produce 100 grams of carbon dioxide (CO2). The initial calculation incorrectly used the formula 2CO + O2 -> 2CO2, leading to an erroneous mass of 70 grams. The correct stoichiometric calculation reveals that 2.083 moles of CO are needed, resulting in a total mass of approximately 58.324 grams of CO. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the molecular composition of CO2, which consists of one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stoichiometry in chemical reactions
  • Familiarity with atomic masses of elements (e.g., carbon and oxygen)
  • Knowledge of chemical formulas and molecular composition
  • Basic algebra for mole and mass calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study stoichiometric calculations in chemical reactions
  • Learn about molecular weights and how to calculate them
  • Explore the concept of moles in chemistry
  • Review the principles of balancing chemical equations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering stoichiometric calculations and chemical reactions.

Fishingaxe
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



calculate the amount of carbon monoxide necessary to form 100 g of carbon dioxide.

The Attempt at a Solution



2CO + O2 -> 2CO2

Oxygen atom mass ≈ 16μ
Carbon atom mass ≈ 12μ

There are 2 carbom atoms and 1 oxygen atom

100/16+24 = 2.5

2.5(16+12) = 70g

Answer: You need 70g CO2 to form 100g carbon dioxide.

Is this right? I've done some research in Swedish on similar problems and pretty much copy pasted the method. If this is right could someone please write what formula this is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chances are it would be right if not for the fact you messed up your math. CO2 is not an oxygen plus two carbon atoms.
 
Is it two oxygen + 1 carbon? :P
 
Yep. Take a look at the formula, or the name.
 
32 + 12 = 48

100/48 = 2.083
2.083(16+12?) = 58.324g

If this is correct why is it 16+12 in the "( )"? I do not yet understand this formula obviously. I know that 16+12 is the atom masses for oxygen and carbon together but why would this be in the formula?
 
Ye firstly I figured it was two oxygen + 1 carbon but another person who apparently "knew" chemistry at a website in swedish wrote it out like that so I figured he were more likely to be right than me. Apperently he was wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K