Is this even scientifically possible?

  • Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date
  • Tags
    even
In summary: Well, if the universe was made from nothing then its total energy would be zero. So the total potential energy would also be zero. And since the total potential energy is always negative, the universe would have to collapse to nothing.
  • #1
The_Absolute
174
0
I've always wondered if it is actually possible for the universe, and all of known reality and space-time to suddenly collapse, or cease to exist. Modern theoretical physics points to multiple universes, other dimensions, etc... Is it actually scientifically possible for all of space-time and all reality to suddenly cease to exist?

I don't know if this thread fits into this particular forum, sorry if this appears to be controversial.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Conjectures along these lines:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1656
The Arrow Of Time In The Landscape
Brett McInnes
"Indeed, string theory does seem to have such scales. The known ways of constructing string vacua resembling our Universe [25] (in that they have a positive cosmological constant) certainly do not lead to universes that endure for arbitrarily long periods of time;
one says that the vacuum is “metastable”."

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0301240
de Sitter Vacua in String Theory
Shamit Kachru, Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, Sandip P. Trivedi
"The lifetime of our metastable de Sitter vacua is much greater than the cosmological timescale of 10^10 years."
 
  • #3
The_Absolute said:
I've always wondered if it is actually possible for the universe, and all of known reality and space-time to suddenly collapse, or cease to exist. Modern theoretical physics points to multiple universes, other dimensions, etc... Is it actually scientifically possible for all of space-time and all reality to suddenly cease to exist?

I don't know if this thread fits into this particular forum, sorry if this appears to be controversial.
Well, not all at once. But it is conceivable that, if the laws of physics are a certain way, then there could be a tunneling event somewhere within our universe to a lower-energy vacuum state. If this were to occur, then it would essentially spread at the speed of light, destroying everything as it spread (as the laws of physics as we know them would be different in a different vacuum state).

Of course, we know that if this sort of thing can occur, it must be exceedingly rare, as it hasn't happened in our observable universe just yet.
 
  • #4
The_Absolute said:
I've always wondered if it is actually possible for the universe, and all of known reality and space-time to suddenly collapse, or cease to exist. Modern theoretical physics points to multiple universes, other dimensions, etc... Is it actually scientifically possible for all of space-time and all reality to suddenly cease to exist?

I don't know if this thread fits into this particular forum, sorry if this appears to be controversial.

It's highly conjectural, but not really controversial. Serious cosmologists have tried to quantify possible "sudden singularities" which might end the Universe in a hurry due to changing cosmological constants and metastable string vacua suddenly tipping into a new state. Lots of room for imagining the "Ultimate Catastrophe", but not a lot of data to work with. So, I'll go out on a limb and say a "sudden end" is possible but presently very unlikely.
 
  • #5
This is an interesting topic and is related to the three ideas of the dark energy (cosmological constant):

1. The cosmological constant is due to the universe being in a true minimum of scalar field energy. Then, the consmological constant is really constant.

2. The cosmological constant is changing with time since the scalar field is decaying with time.

3. We are in a false vacuum metastable local minimum state subject to quantuum tunneling to a true vacuum state. This is kind of the theme of this thread.

It would be interesting to know which one of these three applies to our universe.
 
  • #6
If the universe is made from nothing (as first mused by Edward Tryon circa 1973) then it should collapse to nothing. In a null universe, the positive energy is always equal to the negative potential energy.
 
  • #7
yogi said:
If the universe is made from nothing (as first mused by Edward Tryon circa 1973) then it should collapse to nothing.
Why?
 

1. Is it possible for humans to travel faster than the speed of light?

No, according to Einstein's Theory of Relativity, the speed of light is the maximum speed at which all matter and information in the universe can travel. It is currently not possible for humans to surpass this speed.

2. Can we clone extinct animals using DNA from fossils?

While it may be theoretically possible, scientists have not yet been able to successfully clone an extinct animal using DNA from fossils. The DNA in fossils is often too degraded to be usable for cloning purposes.

3. Is teleportation a real scientific possibility?

While scientists have been able to teleport small particles over short distances, teleportation of larger objects, such as humans, is currently not possible. The amount of energy and precision required for such a feat is beyond our current technological capabilities.

4. Can we harness energy from black holes?

Theoretically, black holes have immense amounts of energy that could potentially be harnessed. However, due to their intense gravitational pull, it is currently not possible for us to approach or manipulate a black hole to extract its energy.

5. Is time travel possible?

While there are theories that suggest time travel may be possible, it has not yet been scientifically proven or achieved. The laws of physics as we currently understand them do not allow for time travel, but further research and advancements in technology may lead to new discoveries in the future.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
617
  • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
348
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top