J.J.T.
- 17
- 6
Silicon Waffle said:Very well said! J.J.T, I totally agree!
The real problem is that no one is designing tests to be focused on critical thinking, because once you let that into the mix different students at different levels of understanding will come up with solutions in different ways that could all be correct. Like the difference between my answer and Vanadium's, neither answer is wrong, nor is either answer "more correct" than the other, but that doesn't bode well for the world of standardized testing, because they just want to put a monkey with an answer key at a desk with 1000 exams to grade . Match the students answer to the one on the key, rinse, repeat x 10,000 more questions. Thus the system is set up with the efficiency of the examination in mind and the student's actual understanding is put on the back-burner.
Thus when you take students that have been given a modern-style education that haven't done their own research/work on their own outside the realm of the classroom and give them a critical thinking question they are kind of right to be upset, but for the wrong reasons. The question itself isn't unfair, but it is unfair that these students have been prepared improperly. It's like training a chef in a classically Italian manner and never training him in any type of international cuisine, and asking him day-in day-out for years to cook classic Italian food. Then one day out of the blue you want Thai-style yellow curry and calling him a failure because he put "too much" garlic in it.
The failure of these students to come up with a correct response is less an academic failure on their part than it is a moral failure on the part of the educational institution.