Is this function realizable for every yes/no why should be provided?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arslan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the realizability of a specific transfer function, (s^2+1)/(s+1), in the context of control systems and Laplace transforms. Participants explore the implications of the function's structure on its physical realizability, providing intuition and examples from practical systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant identifies the function as a Laplace transform and seeks an intuitive explanation for its realizability.
  • Another participant argues that for a system to be realizable, the highest power of s in the denominator must be greater than or equal to that in the numerator, suggesting that the given function is not realizable because the numerator has a higher power.
  • This participant further explains that real systems must include damping factors to prevent infinite responses, citing physical limitations such as air resistance and friction.
  • A different participant describes their modeling of an inverted pendulum system and presents a derived transfer function, claiming it is realizable and practical, despite contrary opinions from others.
  • This participant also mentions that their Simulink results show an impulse response to a step input, arguing that this aligns with the physical behavior of the system under constant acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the realizability of the transfer function, with some supporting the idea that it is not realizable due to the structure of the function, while others argue for its practical realizability based on specific system modeling.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of realizability and the specific conditions under which a system can be considered realizable. The discussion includes various interpretations of physical behavior in relation to mathematical models.

Arslan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Is this function realizable for every yes/no "why" should be provided?

(s^2+1)/(s+1)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


its the laplace transform , give me intution based answer
 


I thought about this for a bit while sitting in Sensors & Controls class, using a ton of Laplace transforms. I think this is right, but here goes:

The determining factor concerns the highest power of s in both the numerator and denominator, so let's call them m and n, respectively. Mathematically, real systems correspond to transforms where n >= m, so the highest power in the denominator has to be greater than the highest power in the numerator. As you can see in your example, the numerator power is higher, so this is not a realizable system. Also, try doing an inverse laplace transform on it.

Intuitively, though, the frequency response of such systems tend towards infinity, with nothing damping it. This never happens in reality because no quantity ever "reaches" infinity -- there's always something damping it. Things like air resistance, friction, heat transfer, and viscocity all stop systems from racing off towards infinity; even subatomic particles are (ostensibly) limited by the speed of light. Any physically relizable system needs to have damping factors like these included in the system's model.

Plot this system in MATLAB to see the frequency response:
bode(tf([1 0 1], [1 1])).

Anyways, that's my interpretation... can anyone confirm this?
 


i was doing the modeling of inverted pendulum attached to cart and pulley and also a servo motor attached with it.I divided transfer function in 3 parts i.e
1.Voltage and angular frequency of pulley
2.angular frequency of pulley and force on cart
3.Force on cart and angle of pendulum

. and there i get a transfer function between force applied on cart and angular frequency as
Jw'=(F-Bw)*r

F(s)/w(s)=(J/r)s+B

and it is a realizable and practicle system.
But theries are saying it is not realizable?
 

Attachments

  • invped.jpg
    invped.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 441


and also its simulink results are showing an impulse as output to step response.
And it is intuitively correct that the applied torque will only apply force on cart in form of pulse. i.e body can experience constant force if it is accelerating. if it is moving with contant velcity applied force will be zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
471
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K