Is This Geometry Problem Solvable Using Variables?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dunkaroos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a geometry problem encountered in a math competition, specifically focusing on finding the area of a shaded region involving circular segments and an inscribed square. Participants explore various methods to express the solution using variables, including calculus and geometric reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the area of a sector of a circle to find the area of a similar shape not centered at the circle's center.
  • Another participant proposes calculating the area as the sum of four equal segments of the circle and the area of the inscribed square, providing a formula for the segment area.
  • A different approach involves integrating a quadratic function to find the area, with constants determined by specific points.
  • Some participants share specific area calculations, with one stating an area of 1 + π/3 - √3, assuming a unit square.
  • There is a mention of a potential 3D equivalent problem involving a unit cube and spheres at each vertex, raising questions about generalization to n-cubes.
  • Several participants inquire about the possibility of solving the problem without calculus, with one asserting that it can be done.
  • A participant expresses confusion about their calculations and seeks clarification on their reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on how to approach the problem, with no consensus on a single method or solution. Some calculations and methods are challenged or refined, but disagreements remain regarding the correctness of various approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations and reasoning, indicating potential missing assumptions or misunderstandings in the problem-solving process.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for high school students preparing for math competitions, educators looking for problem-solving strategies, and enthusiasts interested in geometric reasoning and calculus applications.

Dunkaroos
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I had it on a math competition today and I couldn't think of anything. Express using variables.

Any insights guys?

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/8684/math1wy.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My first thought is tedius, but completely straightforward.

Do you know the area of a sector of a circle? Can you find the area of a similar shape whose vertex is not at the center of the circle? If so, then you can find the area of this shaded region.
 
^ Sorry... I don't.

I'm a high school senior if that matters.
 
Actually, it's a very simple calculation. You can just treat the required area as the sum of 4 equal segments (not sectors) of the circle plus the inscribed square.

To find the area of one segment use the formula [tex]a = \frac{1}{2}r^2(\theta - \sin\theta)[/tex]. [tex]\theta[/tex] is labelled as angle PDQ in the attachment.

To find [tex]\theta[/tex], observe that two of the quarter-circle arcs meet at a point corresponding to a vertical distance halfway along the side of the square (in order to preserve symmetry). An equilateral triangle PDC is formed by 3 lengths, one of them being the side of the circumscribing square (DC) (which is also the radius of the circle) and the others being the chords going from the corners of the square to the circle. Hence the angle subtended by the chord and the side of the square angle PDC is [tex]\frac{\pi}{3}[/tex]. [tex]\theta[/tex] can be calculated from this by subtracting [tex]\frac{\pi}{4}[/tex] and doubling, i.e. [tex]\theta = 2(\frac{\pi}{3} - \frac{\pi}{4}) = \frac{\pi}{6}[/tex].

The rest of the calculation is easy. Just plug in the value of theta to find the area of one segment and multiply by four. To find the area of the inscribed square, use the side (given by [tex]2r\sin{(\frac{\pi}{12})}[/tex] and square that. Add it all up to give the required area.

BTW, not to give away the exact answer, but I get mine as being slightly less than a third of the area of the big circumscribing square.
 

Attachments

  • math1wy.jpg
    math1wy.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 447
Last edited:
now that the four arcs intersect relative to 4 centers of 4 edges
You choose center of square is (0,0), then points are from -a to a.
That problem can be solved by integrate y=mx^2+nx+p
m,n,p are constants found by picking up 3 special points
finally multiply 4 to find the result
 
Boaboa said:
now that the four arcs intersect relative to 4 centers of 4 edges
You choose center of square is (0,0), then points are from -a to a.
That problem can be solved by integrate y=mx^2+nx+p
m,n,p are constants found by picking up 3 special points
finally multiply 4 to find the result

Isn't that overkill for this problem?
 
I got 1 + pi/3 - sqrt(3).

Thats assuming its a unit square of course (othewise just multiply by the area of the square).

I used :
Area = 2 times Area "()" plus 4 times Area "/\" minus 1 times Area of outer square.

Sorry about the cryptic descriptions of the regions but I'm too lazy to draw a proper diagram. Area "()" refers to the region that looks a bit like that and "/\" refers to the little inverted V shaped region with base BC.
 
uart said:
I got 1 + pi/3 - sqrt(3).
This is correct, I found the same answer through a geometrical approach.

Check using calculus:

[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> 8\int\limits_{\frac{\pi }{6}}^{\frac{\pi }{4}} {\int\limits_{\frac{1}{{2\sin t}}}^1 {rdr} dt} = 8\int\limits_{\frac{\pi }{6}}^{\frac{\pi }{4}} {\left[ {\frac{{r^2 }}{2}} \right]_{\frac{1}{{2\sin t}}}^1 dt} = 8\int\limits_{\frac{\pi }{6}}^{\frac{\pi }{4}} {\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{{8\sin ^2 t}}dt} = 8\left[ {\frac{t}{2} + \frac{{\cot t}}{8}} \right]_{\frac{\pi }{6}}^{\frac{\pi }{4}} \\ \\ <br /> = 8\left( {\left( {\frac{\pi }{8} + \frac{1}{8}} \right) - \left( {\frac{\pi }{{12}} + \frac{{\sqrt 3 }}{8}} \right)} \right) = 8 \cdot \frac{{\pi - 3\sqrt 3 + 3}}{{24}} = \frac{\pi }{3} - \sqrt 3 + 1 \approx 0.315 \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

I integrated over the http://www.td-hosting.com/wisfaq/cirkels.gif" , multiplied by 8.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps the 3D-equivalent is a bit more challenging.
A unit cube with a unit sphere on each vertex. Find the common volume.

Or would it even be possible to generalize this to n-cubes with n-spheres, creating a common n-volume? This is over my head :redface:
 
  • #10
Thank You very much!

Can it be solved without Calculus?
 
  • #11
Dunkaroos said:
Thank You very much!

Can it be solved without Calculus?

Yes! For example, see my post.:smile:
 
  • #12
Just keep in mind the symmetry of this problem...it should help significantly.
 
  • #13
Well, there's something I'm not getting on this problem. basically i found the intersection between each 2 quarters of circle:

A() = 2A0/4 - A[] = A0/2 - A []

then i found the common area between the 4 quarters:

Ac = A0 - A[]

Now, from what i think:

Ac = 2*A() + 2*A

However I'm getting A= (r^2)/2 which can't be true.

Where am i wrong?
 
  • #14
You guys are right...

The answer was given to me today
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K