Is This Proof that 1=2 Valid or Fallacious?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enjoicube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a theorem that claims if there exists a real number \( x \) such that \( (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4 \), then it follows that \( 1=2 \). Participants are examining the validity of this proof and exploring the implications of the statements made within it.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the proof, particularly focusing on the assumptions made in the initial statements and the implications of dividing by \( (x-2) \). There is also an exploration of the existence of a real number \( x \) that satisfies the equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified potential errors in the proof, particularly regarding the division by zero and the implications of the hypothesis. There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions under which the theorem holds true.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the proof relies on the existence of a specific \( x \) and question the validity of dividing by \( (x-2) \) when \( x=2 \) is a solution to the equation, which could lead to division by zero.

Enjoicube
Messages
48
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Alright here it is:

Theorem: if there exists an x belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4 then 1=2.

Remark: note that there is such an x belonging to reals.

Proof:

1) by hypothesis assume there exists an X belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4

2)factor each side,

3)resulting in (x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

4)divide each side by (x-2),

5)resulting in x+1=x+2

6)subtract x from each side, resulting in 1=2

1) What terminology (quantifiers, predicates) can be used to express the entire statements 1,3,5

2)Why is this proof fallacious, refer to statements by their numbers. Hint: What are the domains for each statement?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, my attempt at part one (is
Theorem: (\existsX \in\Re) \right arrow ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 1: \existsX \in\Re ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 3:\existsX \in\Re(x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

Statement 5:\existsX \in\Rex+1=x+2

For part 2, i am quite lost, the problem is the use of existential quantifier. My guess is a division by zero somewhere, but otherwise, I need a bigger hint.

Homework Statement


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Enjoicube said:

Homework Statement


Alright here it is:

Theorem: if there exists an x belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4 then 1=2.

Remark: note that there is such an x belonging to reals.

Proof:

1) by hypothesis assume there exists an X belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4

2)factor each side,

3)resulting in (x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

4)divide each side by (x-2),

5)resulting in x+1=x+2

6)subtract x from each side, resulting in 1=2

1) What terminology (quantifiers, predicates) can be used to express the entire statements 1,3,5

2)Why is this proof fallacious, refer to statements by their numbers. Hint: What are the domains for each statement?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, my attempt at part one (is
Theorem: (\existsX \in\Re) \right arrow ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 1: \existsX \in\Re ((x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4))

Statement 3:\existsX \in\Re(x-2)(x+1)=(x-2)(x+2)

Statement 5:\existsX \in\Rex+1=x+2

For part 2, i am quite lost, the problem is the use of existential quantifier. My guess is a division by zero somewhere, but otherwise, I need a bigger hint.

Homework Statement

The theorem starts "there exists an X belonging to reals such that (x^2)-x-2=(x^2)-4". Okay, is that true? If not then the conclusion is false because the hypothesis is false! If it is true, what is that x? In other words, solve x^2- x- 2= x^2- 4. I will tell you right now that the hypothesis is true but once you have determined what that x is, you will see why dividing both sides of the equation by x- 2 is an error.
 
Aha! got it. Thank you so much for that. In retrospect I really should have noticed this x value.
 
In retrospect, I should have been a genius!
 
Actually, in logic, when there are several hypotheses, if any single hypothesis is false the implication (hypotheses imply conclusion) is always true, simply by the nature of the formal definition of a valid argument.

the problem with this "proof" is simply that dividing by x-2 is division by zero, since 2 is a solution to x^2 - x -2 = x^4 - 4
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K