MHB Is this the only right proposition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on three propositions regarding a ring $R$ and polynomials $a$ and $b$ in $R[x]$. Proposition $P_3$, which states that if $R$ is an integral domain and $nc=0$ in $R$, then either $n=0$ or $c=0$, is confirmed as true. In contrast, the validity of propositions $P_1$ and $P_2$ is questioned, with $P_1$ stating that if $a(t)=b(t)$ for all $t \in R$, then $a=b$, and $P_2$ asserting that having nine different elements in $R$ guarantees three different ideals. The consensus is that $A=\{3\}$ is the only correct answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral domains in abstract algebra
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions in ring theory
  • Knowledge of ideal theory in ring structures
  • Basic concepts of mathematical logic and propositions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of integral domains in depth
  • Explore the implications of polynomial equality in rings
  • Research the structure and classification of ideals in rings
  • Examine logical reasoning in mathematical propositions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of rings and polynomial functions will benefit from this discussion.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We are given a ring $R$, polynomials $a$ and $b$ in $R[x]$, an integer $n$, and $c \in R$. We consider the (not necessary true) propositions $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$:

$P_1$: If for any $t \in R$ it holds $a(t)=b(t)$ then $a=b$.

$P_2$: If there are $9$ different elements of $R$ then there are three different ideals of $R$.

$P_3$: If $R$ is an integral domain and $nc=0$ in $R$ then $n=0$ or $c=0$.

Let $A=\{ j \in \{1,2,3\} : P_j \text{ always holds }\}$. Then there are five possible answers for $A$:

  1. $A=\{3\}$
  2. $A=\varnothing$
  3. $A=\{2\}$
  4. $A=\{1\}$
  5. $A=\{1,2\}$

I think that $P_3$ is the only right proposition and thus $A=\{3\}$. Am I right? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

We are given a ring $R$, polynomials $a$ and $b$ in $R[x]$, an integer $n$, and $c \in R$. We consider the (not necessary true) propositions $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$:

$P_1$: If for any $t \in R$ it holds $a(t)=b(t)$ then $a=b$.

$P_2$: If there are $9$ different elements of $R$ then there are three different ideals of $R$.

$P_3$: If $R$ is an integral domain and $nc=0$ in $R$ then $n=0$ or $c=0$.

Let $A=\{ j \in \{1,2,3\} : P_j \text{ always holds }\}$. Then there are five possible answers for $A$:

  1. $A=\{3\}$
  2. $A=\varnothing$
  3. $A=\{2\}$
  4. $A=\{1\}$
  5. $A=\{1,2\}$

I think that $P_3$ is the only right proposition and thus $A=\{3\}$. Am I right? (Thinking)

Hey evinda!

$P_3$ is part of the definition of an integral domain, so yes, it is indeed true.
What is your reasoning that $P_1$ and $P_2$ are false? (Wondering)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
973
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K