MHB Is this the only right proposition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We are given a ring $R$, polynomials $a$ and $b$ in $R[x]$, an integer $n$, and $c \in R$. We consider the (not necessary true) propositions $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$:

$P_1$: If for any $t \in R$ it holds $a(t)=b(t)$ then $a=b$.

$P_2$: If there are $9$ different elements of $R$ then there are three different ideals of $R$.

$P_3$: If $R$ is an integral domain and $nc=0$ in $R$ then $n=0$ or $c=0$.

Let $A=\{ j \in \{1,2,3\} : P_j \text{ always holds }\}$. Then there are five possible answers for $A$:

  1. $A=\{3\}$
  2. $A=\varnothing$
  3. $A=\{2\}$
  4. $A=\{1\}$
  5. $A=\{1,2\}$

I think that $P_3$ is the only right proposition and thus $A=\{3\}$. Am I right? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

We are given a ring $R$, polynomials $a$ and $b$ in $R[x]$, an integer $n$, and $c \in R$. We consider the (not necessary true) propositions $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$:

$P_1$: If for any $t \in R$ it holds $a(t)=b(t)$ then $a=b$.

$P_2$: If there are $9$ different elements of $R$ then there are three different ideals of $R$.

$P_3$: If $R$ is an integral domain and $nc=0$ in $R$ then $n=0$ or $c=0$.

Let $A=\{ j \in \{1,2,3\} : P_j \text{ always holds }\}$. Then there are five possible answers for $A$:

  1. $A=\{3\}$
  2. $A=\varnothing$
  3. $A=\{2\}$
  4. $A=\{1\}$
  5. $A=\{1,2\}$

I think that $P_3$ is the only right proposition and thus $A=\{3\}$. Am I right? (Thinking)

Hey evinda!

$P_3$ is part of the definition of an integral domain, so yes, it is indeed true.
What is your reasoning that $P_1$ and $P_2$ are false? (Wondering)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top