MHB Is this the simplified form of (a + b)^3 - 8c^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor (a + b)^3 - 8c^3.

Is this the difference of cubes?

Formula:

x^3 - a^3 = (x - a)(x^2 + ax + a^2)

Let x = (a + b)

Let a = 8

(a + b - 8)((a + b)^2 + 8(a + b) + 64)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by writing the expression as the difference of cubes:

$$(a+b)^3-8c^3=(a+b)^3-(2c)^3$$

Now apply the difference of cubes formula...:D
 
Why did you write -8c^3 as -(2c)^3?

The number 8 is not part of c^3.

Are you saying that -8•c^3 = (-8c)^3?
 
RTCNTC said:
Why did you write -8c^3 as -(2c)^3?

The number 8 is not part of c^3.

Are you saying that -8•c^3 = (-8c)^3?

I applied the exponential property:

$$x^ny^n=(xy)^n$$

Since $8=2^3$, we can write:

$$8c^3=2^3c^3=(2c)^3$$
 
I got it now.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
741
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
964
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top