Is this vector in the image of the matrix?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining if a vector can be in the image of a given matrix in a control theory context. The matrix is identified as having linearly dependent columns, leading to the conclusion that the image is a subspace rather than a single vector. The user is confused about selecting a value for y in the vector (2, y) to ensure it lies within the image, questioning if scalar multiples of vectors are permissible. Clarifications are provided regarding the nature of the system and the correct interpretation of the mathematical expressions involved. Ultimately, the user acknowledges a misunderstanding in their initial problem setup and plans to revisit the solution after further review.
arhzz
Messages
284
Reaction score
58
Homework Statement
Find the vectors in the image of the matrix
Relevant Equations
-
Hello!

I have this system here $$ \left[ \begin{matrix} -2 & 4 & \\\ 1 & -2 & {} \end{matrix} \right]x +\begin{pmatrix} 2 \\\ y \end{pmatrix}u $$ Now although the problem is for my control theory class,the background is completely math(as is 90% of control theory)

Basically what I need to do is to find the image of this matrix,and than chose y so that the u vector is in the image of the matrix.

So since the vectors in the matrix are linearly dependent we can choose either. so $$ im(A) = \begin{pmatrix} -2 \\\ 1 \end{pmatrix} $$

Now I need to chose y. Now 1 would be the obvious choice but the actual problem is the -2. Since the 2 in the vector is already given to me I cannot change it. And here is my question; let's say I choose y to be -1 that would give me the vector (2 -1),that is not in the image but if I multiply that vector by -1 I get the image vector.So my question is am I allowed to do that? Can i take multiples of a vector for them to be still in my image? If not is it possible that there is no way to choose y for the vector to be in the image of the matrix?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The image is an entire subspace (in essence, the linear hull of the columns), not a single vector. If it were a single vector you would not be allowed to pick one of two arbitrarily!
 
Orodruin said:
The image is an entire subspace (in essence, the linear hull of the columns), not a single vector. If it were a single vector you would not be allowed to pick one of two arbitrarily!
Your definately right, I am not really good at the exact (mathematical) background of these (Engineering student).
 
arhzz said:
I have this system here $$ \left[ \begin{matrix} -2 & 4 & \\\ 1 & -2 & {} \end{matrix} \right]x +\begin{pmatrix} 2 \\\ y \end{pmatrix}u $$
I'm confused by your question. A "system" is typically a system of equations, and such a system can usually be written as a single matrix equation. Should the '+' in your expression above have been '='? That would have been an easy typo to make as both these characters are on the same keyboard key.
arhzz said:
Now although the problem is for my control theory class,the background is completely math(as is 90% of control theory)

Basically what I need to do is to find the image of this matrix,and than chose y so that the u vector is in the image of the matrix.

So since the vectors in the matrix are linearly dependent we can choose either. so $$ im(A) = \begin{pmatrix} -2 \\\ 1 \end{pmatrix} $$
Is A the 2x2 matrix you showed? If so, the fact that the columns of the matrix are linearly dependent means that the nullspace does not consist solely of the zero vector. (The nullspace, or kernel, is the subspace of vectors ##\vec x## in ##\mathbb R^2## such that ##A\vec x = \vec 0##.
arhzz said:
Now I need to chose y. Now 1 would be the obvious choice but the actual problem is the -2. Since the 2 in the vector is already given to me I cannot change it. And here is my question; let's say I choose y to be -1 that would give me the vector (2 -1),that is not in the image but if I multiply that vector by -1 I get the image vector.So my question is am I allowed to do that? Can i take multiples of a vector for them to be still in my image? If not is it possible that there is no way to choose y for the vector to be in the image of the matrix?

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and FactChecker
Mark44 said:
I'm confused by your question. A "system" is typically a system of equations, and such a system can usually be written as a single matrix equation. Should the '+' in your expression above have been '='? That would have been an easy typo to make as both these characters are on the same keyboard key.

Is A the 2x2 matrix you showed? If so, the fact that the columns of the matrix are linearly dependent means that the nullspace does not consist solely of the zero vector. (The nullspace, or kernel, is the subspace of vectors ##\vec x## in ##\mathbb R^2## such that ##A\vec x = \vec
By system is meant that the controller is described by the matrix and the vector, it is not the general sense that it is a system of linear equations, but how we can model the controller so that we can "use it". And you are right about the null space. Since the exam is coming up shortly we had a tutor show us how this is done. I did not actually write the entire problem down correctly, and hence missed a step completely which made the problem of the - sign infront of the 2. I am currently on my phone when I get home I will post the solution and where the error has come up. Thanks for the help !
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...