Is Vacuum Decay from a False to True State Impossible or Just Unlikely?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the theoretical implications of vacuum decay from a false vacuum to a true vacuum state, referencing a paper that argues against such a possibility. The conversation highlights insights from CERN physicist Gian Carlo Giudice, who suggests that a true vacuum state can be excited into a false vacuum through energy injection, such as high-energy cosmic rays. The discussion also clarifies that, according to certain quantum gravity models, decay from de Sitter spacetime will not transition into flat or Anti-de Sitter spacetimes but into an open Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) spacetime with zero cosmological constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum states in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter spacetimes
  • Knowledge of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology
  • Basic principles of quantum gravity models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of vacuum decay in quantum field theory
  • Study the characteristics of de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter spacetimes
  • Examine the role of high-energy cosmic rays in vacuum state transitions
  • Investigate the references provided, particularly the papers linked in the discussion
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in quantum gravity and vacuum state dynamics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
I vacuum decay impossible
I found this paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0211160.pdf) which argues against the possibility of a decay from a metastable vacuum to a true vacuum state. However, this is the first time I've read this. Is it then impossible that a vacuum decay from a false vacuum may occur (even in principle)? Or is it just unlikely (but not strictly impossible)?

Also, I've been told in an email by CERN physicist Gian Carlo Giudice that a true vacuum state could be excited into a false one by "injecting" energy to the vacuum (like with high-energy cosmic rays). However, he did not give any specific source, although what he said seems perfectly logical (if there was energy present in the true vacuum state, why couldn't it excited into a metastable state?) Could you give me some?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
argues against the possibility of a decay from a metastable vacuum to a true vacuum state
Not really, no. It argues that, in a certain kind of quantum gravity model, if you start with de Sitter spacetime (i.e., a positive cosmological constant), and such a decay occurs, it will not be into a flat or Anti-de Sitter (AdS--negative cosmological constant) spacetime, but into an open FRW spacetime with zero cosmological constant.
 
PeterDonis said:
Not really, no. It argues that, in a certain kind of quantum gravity model, if you start with de Sitter spacetime (i.e., a positive cosmological constant), and such a decay occurs, it will not be into a flat or Anti-de Sitter (AdS--negative cosmological constant) spacetime, but into an open FRW spacetime with zero cosmological constant.
Thank you

Also, I've been told in an email by CERN physicist Gian Carlo Giudice that a true vacuum state could be excited into a false one by "injecting" energy to the vacuum (like with high-energy cosmic rays). However, he did not give any specific source, although what he said seems perfectly logical (if there was energy present in the true vacuum state, why couldn't it excited into a metastable state?) I haven't been able to find any clear sources about this. Are any of these such papers?

https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1305 see ref.14 in page 2

https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9905093

https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0417

If not, do you have any?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K