Is wave and heat equation with zero boundary Poisson Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between wave, heat, and Poisson equations, specifically regarding boundary conditions. It is established that wave and heat equations are fundamentally different from Poisson's equation, despite some similarities in solving techniques. The superposition method is confirmed as a valid approach for solving linear problems, including heat and wave equations with non-zero boundaries, by combining particular and homogeneous solutions. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the classification of partial differential equations (PDEs) to apply the correct methodologies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with wave and heat equations
  • Knowledge of Poisson's equation and its applications
  • Proficiency in the superposition principle for linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the classification of partial differential equations in detail
  • Learn about the superposition method in solving linear PDEs
  • Explore numerical techniques for solving integral equations related to PDEs
  • Investigate specific boundary value problems for wave and heat equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with partial differential equations, particularly those focusing on wave and heat transfer problems with complex boundary conditions.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
I have two questions:
(1)As the tittle, if u(a,\theta,t)=0, is
\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {t}}=\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {r}^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {r}}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {\theta}^2}
and
\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {t}^2}=\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {r}^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {r}}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {\theta}^2}
Just Poisson Equation
\nabla^2u=h(r,\theta,t)
Where
h(r,\theta,t)=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {t}}\;\hbox { or }\;h(r,\theta,t)=\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {t}^2}\;\hbox{ respectively.}(2)AND if u(a,\theta,t)=f(r,\theta,t), then we have to use superposition of Poisson with zero boundary plus Dirichlet with u(a,\theta,t)=f(r,\theta,t)?

That is

u(r,\theta,t)=u_1+u_2
where
\nabla^2u_1=h(r,\theta,t)\;\hbox { with }\;u(a,\theta,t)=0
and
\nabla^2u_2=0\;\hbox { with }\;u(a,\theta,t)=f(r,\theta,t)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yungman said:
(1)As the tittle, if u(a,\theta,t)=0, is
\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {t}}=\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {r}^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {r}}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {\theta}^2}
and
\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {t}^2}=\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {r}^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {r}}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {\theta}^2}
Just Poisson Equation
\nabla^2u=h(r,\theta,t)
Where
h(r,\theta,t)=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {t}}\;\hbox { or }\;h(r,\theta,t)=\frac{\partial^2{u}}{\partial {t}^2}\;\hbox{ respectively.}


No. Wave, diffusion, and Poisson's equations are all fundamentally different kinds of PDEs (lookup classification or characteristics in one of your PDE books). However, you can pretend that h is an arbitrary function and formally solve your first two equations. However, your "solution" will be in the form of an integral equation for u (actually, the integral will contain time derivatives of u ...). This kind of trick might be helpful if you have nice approximate/numerical techniques that work well for the integral equation; then again it might just lead to a different mess that you still do not know how to solve.

I'm not sure I understand question 2.

jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
jasonRF said:
No. Wave, diffusion, and Poisson's equations are all fundamentally different kinds of PDEs (lookup classification or characteristics in one of your PDE books). However, you can pretend that h is an arbitrary function and formally solve your first two equations. However, your "solution" will be in the form of an integral equation for u (actually, the integral will contain time derivatives of u ...). This kind of trick might be helpful if you have nice approximate/numerical techniques that work well for the integral equation; then again it might just lead to a different mess that you still do not know how to solve.

I'm not sure I understand question 2.

jason

Thanks for you reply. The reason I asked is when I look at the examples and exercises I see a definite relation where if the boundary is not zero, they use superposition of two where

(1) Assuming \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {t}}\neq 0 and then solve it as if it's a Poisson problem with zero boundary.

(2) Assuming \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial {t}}=0 and then solve it as if it's a Dirichlet problem with non zero boundary.

The methodology is exactly the same as solving Poisson problem with non zero boundary.

The second part is just what I said above that solving Heat and Wave problem with non zero boundary is exactly like solving Poisson problem with non zero boundary.

Thanks
 
If this way of superposition technique might not work well with Heat and Wave problem, what is the standard way of solving Heat and Wave problems with non zero boundary?
 
Yes, you can use superposition to solve linear problems. We find a particular solution, then add an appropriate homogeneous solution such that the total solution satisfies the equation and all appropriate conditions.

I just didn't understand how (2) related to (1) ... or are they independent questions altogether?
jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
jasonRF said:
Yes, you can use superposition to solve linear problems. We find a particular solution, then add an appropriate homogeneous solution such that the total solution satisfies the equation and all appropriate conditions.

I just didn't understand how (2) related to (1) ... or are they independent questions altogether?
jason

Thanks for the reply

(2) is just another way to say about non zero boundary u(a,\theta,t)=f(\theta, t). Which you already confirmed that the method of solving is using superposition just like solving Poisson problem with non zero boundary.

You answered all my questions:

1) That Heat and Wave equations are not Poisson equation.

2) The method of solving Heat and Wave with non zero boundary is by superposition of the homogeneous solution plus particular solution...Just like solving Poisson with non zero boundary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K