Is Weapons Engineering Ethically Justifiable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter admiralmurf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Ethics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ethical implications of pursuing a career in weapons engineering, particularly from the perspective of a Physics BSc student considering a Master's in Mechanical Engineering. The student argues that their involvement could improve existing weaponry, while critics emphasize that the ethical considerations should focus on the intended use of weapons rather than the individual's role. The conversation highlights the tension between personal beliefs and societal perceptions regarding the morality of weapons development.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ethical theories related to engineering and technology
  • Familiarity with mechanical engineering principles
  • Knowledge of the defense industry and its implications
  • Awareness of public perception and societal impact of weapons technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research ethical frameworks in engineering, such as utilitarianism and deontological ethics
  • Explore the role of mechanical engineers in defense and military applications
  • Investigate the societal impacts of advanced weaponry and military technology
  • Examine case studies of ethical dilemmas faced by weapons engineers
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering fields, ethicists, defense industry professionals, and anyone interested in the moral implications of weapons technology.

admiralmurf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently doing my Physics BSc and I'm thinking about my future job. So far, I've decided that I would like to go to the U.S. and do a Masters in Mechanical Engineering, and then become a weapons engineer.

Generally, this is met by people telling me I would be a killer, and shouldn't follow this career path. I personally feel that this is not ethically wrong. I feel this way due to a number of reasons. Firstly, I'm sure someone else would take my place if I didn't get this job. Furthermore, I feel as though my presence could only improve what already exists, whereas my absence (or perhaps the absence of all weapons engineers) could only lead to what already exists remaining, which includes missiles, bombs and firearms.

I would really appreciate hearing from other people with an opinion on this, with perhaps some other arguments for each side.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

The argument that someone else would do it if you didn't has nothing to do with ethics. The ethics comes from your personal beliefs about what the weapons are used for, ie, defense of your country.
 
admiralmurf said:
Generally, this is met by people telling me I would be a killer, and shouldn't follow this career path.

Does this bother you (It appears that it does, or that you're wondering if it should)? If so, why are you concerned with what other people think?

admiralmurf said:
Firstly, I'm sure someone else would take my place if I didn't get this job.

Weak sauce. As stated by Russ, it has nothing to do with ethics.

admiralmurf said:
Furthermore, I feel as though my presence could only improve what already exists, whereas my absence (or perhaps the absence of all weapons engineers) could only lead to what already exists remaining, which includes missiles, bombs and firearms.

OK. So why are you concerned with advancement of weapons technology?

You haven't stated anything you really think about weapons/weapons technology yet, much less made an ethical argument. Try stating what you think before asking for others to tell you what you want to hear.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K