Is x2+16 Prime? Understanding the Nature of this Polynomial

  • Thread starter Thread starter JR Sauerland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The polynomial x² + 16 is irreducible over the integers, rationals, and reals, meaning it cannot be factored into simpler polynomials with real coefficients. However, it is reducible over the complex numbers. The polynomial evaluates to prime numbers for specific integer values, such as 17 when x = 1, but does not yield prime results for other integers like 0, 2, or 3. Understanding the irreducibility of polynomials requires specifying the number field or ring in which the polynomials are considered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of irreducibility in algebraic structures
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their role in polynomial factorization
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study polynomial irreducibility over different number fields
  • Learn about the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and its implications
  • Explore methods for proving irreducibility of polynomials
  • Investigate the relationship between polynomial values and prime numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, educators, and anyone interested in polynomial theory and its applications in number theory.

JR Sauerland
Gold Member
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


x2+16

Homework Equations


?

The Attempt at a Solution


If you attempt to solve it with (x+4)(x+4), it results in x2+8x+16, which is not equivalent. I believe it may be prime. I am looking for the formula (if there is any) to explain this. Allow me to give an example:
a2+2ab+b2 <<< This is the square of a binomial formula. Does my type of problem have a formula that explains its nature? If it's prime, how would I phrase it? axn+b=?

edit: back of the book states it is prime. Oops :p
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if x = 2k, with k some natural number then we get (2k)^2 +16. Is that prime?
 
dirk_mec1 said:
Well if x = 2k, with k some natural number then we get (2k)^2 +16. Is that prime?
I honestly have no idea :oops: 2k2+16... It seems like we can factor out a 2. 2(k2+8)?
 
JR Sauerland said:

Homework Statement


x2+16

Homework Equations


?

The Attempt at a Solution


If you attempt to solve it with (x+4)(x+4), it results in x2+8x+16, which is not equivalent. I believe it may be prime. I am looking for the formula (if there is any) to explain this. Allow me to give an example:
a2+2ab+b2 <<< This is the square of a binomial formula. Does my type of problem have a formula that explains its nature? If it's prime, how would I phrase it? axn+b=?

edit: back of the book states it is prime. Oops :p

Your question is unclear. I can see two possible meanings: (1) is ##x^2 + 16## a prime number when ##x## is an integer?
(2) Is the polynomial ##x^2 + 16## prime (= "irreducible?") in the algebraic sense?

In case (1) the answer is NO: ##p(x) = x^2 + 16## is the prime number 17 when ##x = 1##, but for ##x = 0, 2, 3, 4, \ldots## it is not prime. I suppose a valid question is whether ##p(x)## can ever be prime again for some integer ##x \geq 2##. I don't have the answer to that.

In case (2) you need to specify the number field or ring over which you polynomials taken; that is, what types of numbers will you allow in a factorization? Your polynomial ##p(x)## is irreducible (="prime"?) over the integers, rationals or reals, but is reducible (not prime?) over the complex numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Student100 and thelema418
Ray Vickson said:
Your question is unclear. I can see two possible meanings: (1) is ##x^2 + 16## a prime number when ##x## is an integer?
(2) Is the polynomial ##x^2 + 16## prime (= "irreducible?") in the algebraic sense?

In case (1) the answer is NO: ##p(x) = x^2 + 16## is the prime number 17 when ##x = 1##, but for ##x = 0, 2, 3, 4, \ldots## it is not prime. I suppose a valid question is whether ##p(x)## can ever be prime again for some integer ##x \geq 2##. I don't have the answer to that.

In case (2) you need to specify the number field or ring over which you polynomials taken; that is, what types of numbers will you allow in a factorization? Your polynomial ##p(x)## is irreducible (="prime"?) over the integers, rationals or reals, but is reducible (not prime?) over the complex numbers.

In my experience, case (2) is what this means. I much prefer the terminology irreducible over . . . rather than prime, but many textbooks, esp. high school level books prefer the word prime.

Following back to JR Sauerland's original question, this is an interesting problem to consider tactics for proof. What techniques or methods can you use to argue that this cannot be reduced over the reals? There are several arguments that could be made. Feel free to demonstrate that this is not reducible.
 
JR Sauerland said:

Homework Statement


x2+16

What are the roots of x^2+16? In other words, what are the values of x (if there are any) such that x^2+16=0.

JR Sauerland said:
dirk_mec1 said:
Well if x = 2k, with k some natural number then we get (2k)^2 +16. Is that prime?
I honestly have no idea :oops: 2k2+16... It seems like we can factor out a 2. 2(k2+8)?

If x=2k, then x^2=(2k)^2=2^2k^2=4k^2 and not 2k^2. Also, make sure to add parentheses where necessary, because 2k^2 is different to (2k)^2 since exponents have higher precedence than multiplying, so 2k^2=2(k^2). Finally this means that you should be able to factor out a 4 in (2k)^2+16 to get 4(k^2+4).

But alas this isn't going to help you solve your problem because what you've asked can be mistaken for a harder problem. What you're looking for is to find if the polynomial is irreducible as has been already mentioned.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K