Isometric operators- spectrum preserving?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter muppet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Spectrum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of Moller operators (\Omega) in quantum scattering as defined in Taylor's text, which are isometric but not necessarily unitary in infinite-dimensional spaces. The key relationship established is that \Omega^{\dagger}H\Omega=H_0, where H is the interacting Hamiltonian and H_0 is the kinetic term. The participants debate whether the spectrum of H_0 coincides with the energies of the non-bound states of H, with one contributor suggesting that this assumption is reasonable but not universally applicable, particularly in cases of finite mass renormalization. The implications of the non-unitarity of \Omega and its effects on the spectra are also discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Moller operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonians and their spectra
  • Knowledge of isometric versus unitary operators
  • Basic concepts of scattering theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Moller operators in quantum scattering theory
  • Explore the implications of non-unitarity in infinite-dimensional spaces
  • Investigate the relationship between bound and non-bound states in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about mass renormalization in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and scattering theory, as well as graduate students studying advanced quantum field theory concepts.

muppet
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm working on Taylor's text on scattering (a reference from Peskin and Schroeder). They define the Moller operators [tex]\Omega[/tex] which are isometric, satisfying
[tex]\Omega^{\dagger}\Omega=1[/tex]
This is not necessarily the same as unitary in an infinite dimensional space, the difference being that an infinite dimensional space can be mapped isometrically onto a proper subset of itself, so that state vectors exist for which [tex]\Omega^{-1}[/tex] is undefined. On states in the range of \Omega
[tex]\Omega^{\dagger}=\Omega^{-1}[/tex];
for states outside of this range, [tex]\Omega^{\dagger}=0[/tex].

They show that
[tex]\Omega^{\dagger}H\Omega=H_0[/tex]
where H is an interacting hamiltonian and H_0 its kinetic term. They argue that if Omega were unitary then H and H_0 would have to have the same spectra; only in the case where H has no bound states is Omega unitary, and the spectra coincide.

My question is: is it true that the spectrum of H_0 coincides with the energies of the non-bound states of H? This assumption is usually made in other treatments of scattering I've seen, and it seems a reasonable conclusion, but it's striking that the author belabours the non-unitarity of Omega rather than explains the reasoning behind what's taken as a given in other accounts, and the book is very careful to point out that other plausible statements can be wrong (for example, the Moller operators are non-unitary even though they are defined as the limit of a product of unitary operators, and the calculus of limits theorem doesn't hold for operators apparently, which is also something I'd like to understand better).

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is it true that the spectrum of H_0 coincides with the energies of the non-bound states of H?
I think you're right that this is a reasonable assumption but definitely an assumption. For example in a field theory in which the mass renormalization is finite, the space of continuum states of H and H0 would be different.
 
Thanks for your reply.
I think it may actually be possible to demonstrate the partial equivalence of the spectra,
Let
[tex]H|\psi\rangle =E|\psi\rangle[/tex]
and
[tex]\Omega|\phi\rangle=|\psi\rangle[/tex]
Then
[tex]H|\psi\rangle=H\Omega|\phi\rangle=E\Omega|\phi \rangle[/tex]
Acting on the left with \Omega^{\dagger} we then have
[tex]\Omega^{\dagger} H \Omega|\phi\rangle =H_0|\phi\rangle=E\Omega^{\dagger}\Omega|\phi \rangle =E|\phi\rangle[/tex]
Therefore
[tex]H_0|\phi\rangle =E|\phi\rangle[/tex]
i.e. the image of an eigenstate of the free hamiltonian under a Moller operator is an eigenstate of the full hamiltonian with the same eigenvalue.

Thinking about this setup a little more, however, it seems that taking the adjoint of
[tex]\Omega^{\dagger}H\Omega=H_0[/tex]
implies that the free hamiltonian should annihilate the bound states, which seems highly suspect... any thoughts?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K