Isomorphism from <R,+> to <R+,\times>: Proving 1-1 and Onto Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter LMKIYHAQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the exploration of an isomorphism between the structures and , specifically examining the function \phi(r)=0.5^{r}. Participants are focused on proving the function is one-to-one and onto.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods to demonstrate that \phi is one-to-one, including the use of logarithmic functions. There is uncertainty about the appropriate logarithmic base and its domain. Some suggest rewriting the function for clarity, while others question the validity of their approaches.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing suggestions and clarifications. There is acknowledgment that proving the function is one-to-one is necessary, but further discussion is needed to establish whether it is onto and to verify the properties required for an isomorphism.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of isomorphisms, particularly in relation to the requirements of showing both one-to-one and onto characteristics, as well as the need to verify the preservation of operations.

LMKIYHAQ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is there an isomorphism from <R,+> to <R+,[tex]\times[/tex]> where [tex]\phi[/tex](r)=0.5[tex]^{r}[/tex] when r [tex]\in[/tex] R?

2. Homework Equations
For an isomorphism I know it is necessary to show there is a 1-1 and onto function. I am unsure if I can use the steps I am trying to use to show it is 1-1.

The Attempt at a Solution



For phi(r)=phi(s) I want to show r=s. Am I able to take the ln (or log?) of both sides to get ln(.05[tex]^{r}[/tex])=ln(0.5[tex]^{s}[/tex])? I am not sure which to use (ln or log) and where these logarithmic functions would be defined since for r=s, r and s are supposed to be real numbers.

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe try rewriting 0.5^r=0.5^s as 2^r=2^s. This may make things cleaner.
 
I don't know how to make that change?
 
Even if that way does clean it up, is my way of taking ln of both sides wrong?
 
Sure, just use logs. (0.5)^r=(0.5)^s iff r*log(0.5)=s*log(0.5). That shows it 1-1. Is it onto? But 1-1 and onto doesn't make it an isomorphism. You have to prove things like phi(r+s)=phi(r)*phi(s), right?
 
Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K