Undergrad Isomorphisms between C4 & Z4 Groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter JackNicholson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Rotations
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on establishing isomorphisms between the cyclic groups C4 and Z4, demonstrating that these mappings preserve the order of elements. The orders of the elements in both groups are calculated, confirming that they match: one identity element, two elements of order 4, and one element of order 2. Two bijective mappings, ψ and ϕ, are defined, illustrating the correspondence between elements of C4 and Z4. The challenge remains to prove that these mappings are homomorphisms without exhaustively listing all cases. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding isomorphisms in group theory.
JackNicholson
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
0

Hint: Show that the isomorphism preserves the order of the element

My solution:

C4 = {e,r,r^2,r^3} where e-identity element and r is rotation by 90°

Z4 = {0,1,2,3}

LEMMA:
! Isomorphism preserves the order of the element !
(PROOF OF IT)Now we calcuate the order of the elements of both groups.

ord(e)=1 -------------- ord(0)=1

ord(r)=4 -------------- ord(1)=4

ord(r^2)=2 ----------- ord(2)=2

ord(r^3)=4 ----------- ord(3)=4

We see that there is 1 element in both groups with order equal 1, 2 elements with order equal 4 and 1 element with order equal 2.

So we can write 2 mappings:

ψ : C4 -> Z4

ψ(e)=0

ψ(r)=1

ψ(r^2)=2

ψ(r^3)=3

ϕ: C4 -> Z4

ϕ(e)=0

ϕ(r)=3

ϕ(r^2)=2

ϕ(r^3)=1

We can see it clearly that those mapping are bijective.And now how show that those 2 functions are also homomorphism? I know that homomorphism is when: ϕ(xy)=ϕ(x) + ϕ(y) but how show it in this certain case without writing every possible situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write your mappings more easily as \psi^{-1}(n) = r^{n} and \phi^{-1}(n) = r^{-n}.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
815
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
910
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
840
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
491