Isomorphisms between cyclic groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic Groups
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the total number of isomorphisms between cyclic groups G and G', where both groups have the same order. It is established that the number of isomorphisms corresponds to the number of generators of G', which can be expressed as mappings of the form θ(a) = b^k, where gcd(k, m) = 1. The key point is that any isomorphism must map a generator of G to a generator of G', ensuring that the structure of the groups is preserved. The confusion arises from the assumption that multiple mappings of generators can exist independently, but in reality, mapping one generator determines the mappings of all others. Ultimately, the total number of isomorphisms is indeed tied to the count of generators in G'.
sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
Ok, here is something i thought i understood, but it turns out i am having difficulties fully grasping/proving it.

Let \theta:G->G' be an isomorphism between G and G', where o(G)=m=o(G'), and both G and G' are cyclic, i.e. G=[a] and G'=

So my question is, when we want to find the total number of isomorphisms from G to G', i 'know' that the total number of such isomorphisms is basically
the number of generators of G':
\theta(a)=b^k where gcd(k,m)=1. But i don't really understand why? That is, how are we sure that by just counting the number of generators on G' we are actually finding the total number of such isomorphisms. ?

Any explanations would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose \theta were any isomorphism from G to G'. Apply \theta to a generator of G. It is simple to prove that \theta MUST map a generator to a generator. So it is easy to see that it is a matter of how many generators each has: each mapping of generator to generator gives an isomorphism.
 
well, yeah, i know how to prove that an isomorphism perserves the order of each element, and thus must mapp a generator to a generator, but say for example that the generators of G=[a] are a, a^3,a^5, a^7, and the generators of G'= are b, b^3, b^5,b^7, then to me it looks more logical to have these isomorphisms:
first \theta(a)=b^i; \theta(a^3)=b^i, \theta(a^5)=b^i;\theta(a^7)=b^i,i=1,3,5,7 , which means not 4, but 4! isomorphisms.

So, what am i missing here?
 
Once you map a generator somewhere you fix where every other element in the group goes. You can't map say a to b and a^3 to b^5 with one homomorphism because the first implies that a^3 must map to b^3.
 
well, yeah, i think i get it.

thnx
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
529
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
852
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
525
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K