Isotropic loudspeaker - calc based

  • Thread starter Thread starter sapiental
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotropic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an isotropic loudspeaker emitting sound at a specific frequency and intensity, with participants exploring calculations related to displacement amplitude, pressure amplitude, and intensity at different distances. The subject area includes wave mechanics and sound propagation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of isotropic sound propagation on calculations, questioning whether it affects the displacement amplitude. Various formulas for intensity, pressure amplitude, and displacement amplitude are proposed and examined. Some participants suggest eliminating the bulk modulus from the equations and relate intensity to pressure and displacement amplitudes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify their understanding of the relationships between different parameters. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of formulas, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that there are no reflections affecting the sound propagation, and they are navigating through the implications of the given parameters such as frequency, intensity, and the properties of air.

sapiental
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
1) Isotropic loudspeaker A certain loudspeaker system emits sound isotropically
with a frequency of 2.00 x 103 Hz and an intensity of 1.00 x 10-3 W/m2 at a distance of 7.00 m.
Assume there are no reflections. Use 344 m/s for the velocity of sound in air and 1.21 kg/m3 for
the density of air.
a) What is the displacement amplitude at 7.00 m?
b) What is the pressure amplitude at 7.00 m?
c) What is the intensity at 25.0 m?

Hi, does the term isotropic change the way I calculate the displacement amplitude or does the wave still propagate in the +x direction?

I want to use these formulas,

v = sqrt(B/p) B is the bulk modulus and p is the density.
v = (f)(wavelength)

I = 1/2(sqrt(pB)(w^2)(A^2) = (p_max^2)/(2pv)

= (p_max^2)/(2(sqrt(pB))

for the intensity formula denoted I. p = density and p_max is the pressure amplitude which is directly proporional to A, the displacement amplitude.


please let me know if I can use these formulas for this case.. thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isotropic just means that the sounds travels equally in all directions, so the intensity will drop off as 1/r^2.

Those equations are OK, but you should be able to write the intensity as a function of pressure amplitude or displacement amplitude without needing the bulk modulus. (Since you have density and speed as given.)
 
do you mean something like this

p_max(x) = sqrt((I)(2pv))sin(kx)
 
Last edited:
No. Start with your equation:
sapiental said:
I = 1/2(sqrt(pB)(w^2)(A^2) = (p_max^2)/(2pv)

The right hand term gives you intensity as a function of pressure amplitude.

To find intensity as a function of displacement amplitude, eliminate "sqrt(pB)" from the middle term.

Neither equation will have B.
 
ok,

a ) 1.00 x 10-3 W/m2 = (p_max^2)/(2(1.21 kg/m3)(344m/s)
(p_max) = sqrt((1.00 x 10-3 W/m2)(2(1.21 kg/m3)(344m/s))
= .91m

b) then the equation just becomes I = (w^2)(A^2) = y_max?

w = vk
k = 2pi/wavelength
v = (f)wavelenth
 
sapiental said:
a ) 1.00 x 10-3 W/m2 = (p_max^2)/(2(1.21 kg/m3)(344m/s)
(p_max) = sqrt((1.00 x 10-3 W/m2)(2(1.21 kg/m3)(344m/s))
= .91m
That's pressure amplitude, not displacement amplitude. (Units!)

b) then the equation just becomes I = (w^2)(A^2) = y_max?
Huh? y_max is A! You already had the equation:
I = 1/2(sqrt(pB)(w^2)(A^2)
Just replace sqrt(pB) to eliminate B from the expression. (Hint: v = sqrt(B/p)... so what's sqrt(pB)?)
 
hmm

I = 1/2pv(w^2)(A^2)

?

thank you!
 
sapiental said:
hmm

I = 1/2pv(w^2)(A^2)

?
That's the one. (Relate w to frequency and you're done. Then you can solve for A.)
 
w = vk
k = 2pi/wavelength
v = (f)wavelenth

ok i just want to make sure that this is right,

v/f = wavelength
344/2.00 x 10^3 = .172m

so k = 2pi/.172 = 36.53

w = vk = 344 * 36.53 = 12566.3

so (A) = sqrt((1.00 x 10-3 W/m2)/(1/2(344m/s)(1.21kg/m^3)(12566.3^2)))
A = 1.74 * 10 ^-7

this seems wrong..
 
  • #10
I didn't check over your last calculations, but frequency and omega are related by: [itex]\omega = 2 \pi f[/itex]. Combine that with your equation from post #7.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K