Pressure variation with sound waves equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum pressure variation (Pmax) associated with sound waves produced by a speaker, given specific parameters such as power, temperature, and density of air. The subject area includes concepts from acoustics and fluid dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between intensity, density, and speed of sound to derive Pmax. They question the unit consistency in their calculations and the physical meaning of Pmax in relation to atmospheric pressure.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in unit analysis and clarifying the definitions of pressure. Some guidance has been offered regarding unit conversions and the interpretation of Pmax, but no consensus on the final value has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the expected proximity of Pmax to standard atmospheric pressure values and the implications of their calculated results. There is a focus on ensuring that the units align correctly with physical definitions.

llatosz
Messages
62
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


P(average) for a speaker is 10 W. Gamma is 1.4 (ratio of specific heats), molar mass is 28.8 g/mol, air temperature is 50F, and pressure is 1atm. Find Pmax at 100
I have this equation that gives Intensity = (Pmax^2)/(2*Rho*v) where rho is density, and v is speed of sound through this air

Homework Equations


All but one value has already been found:
Solved:
Rho = .001239 g/cm^3 = 1.239 kg/m^3
v = 338.28 m/s
I = 7.9577x10^(-5) W/m^2
(all reasonable values)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm just trying to solve for Pmax, very simple, but the units don't work out. So the equation becomes
Pmax = sqrt( 2 * I * Rho * v )
and the units for pressure become sqrt( J * kg / (m^4 * s^2) ) which is (square Joules) * (square kg) /( m^2 * s)
which doesn't make any sense to me, and the answer becomes 0.258 but intuitively this one doesn't seem reasonable, shouldn't the maximum pressure only be VERY slightly different than the regular pressure? Shouldn't the units be some kind of Force per area?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
llatosz said:
Pmax = sqrt( 2 * I * Rho * v )
and the units for pressure become sqrt( J * kg / (m^4 * s^2) ) which is (square Joules) * (square kg) /( m^2 * s)
which doesn't make any sense to me,
Simplify further by expressing Joules in terms of kg, m ,s.
and and the answer becomes 0.258 but intuitively this one doesn't seem reasonable, shouldn't the maximum pressure only be VERY slightly different than the regular pressure?
What do you consider to be the "regular pressure" in SI units?
 
I would consider Newtons per square meter to be SI units. But what would be the .258 for Pmax that i calculated for? I know it can't be kPa, Pa, atm, or Torr/mmHg because Pmax should be very close to 101.3kPa , 1.0atm, or 760Torr, but 0.25 isn't a number close to any of those.
Isnt it in its simpliest form with sqrt(J kg)/ (m^2 * s^2) ?
Is a Newton the same thing as a J * kg maybe?
 
llatosz said:
I would consider Newtons per square meter to be SI units. But what would be the .258 for Pmax that i calculated for? I know it can't be kPa, Pa, atm, or Torr/mmHg because Pmax should be very close to 101.3kPa , 1.0atm, or 760Torr, but 0.25 isn't a number close to any of those.
Does Pmax denote the maximum absolute pressure, or the maximum amount that the pressure deviates from the unperturbed pressure?
Isnt it in its simpliest form with sqrt(J kg)/ (m^2 * s^2) ?
Should the seconds be squared here? I'm assuming that only the J and the kg are inside the square root.

There are different ways you can show that your units boil down to the units for pressure. If you want to express Joules in terms of Newtons, then that would be OK. You would then still need to know the relation between the Newton and the units of kg, m, and s.
Is a Newton the same thing as a J * kg maybe?
No.
 
Opps i meant sqrt(J kg)/ (m^2 * s ), and yes, with only the square root on on J and kg. I am pretty sure P_max denotes the maximum absolute pressure. Do you happen to know if this equation is true? It was given by the professor so I assume it is, but there is no such thing as "root kg" or "root joules" lol. Do you happen to know what units this .258 is? If so, I could put all the units in my notes and figure out from there
 
llatosz said:
Opps i meant sqrt(J kg)/ (m^2 * s ), and yes, with only the square root on on J and kg.
OK

Take any formula you know for energy, such as the formula for kinetic energy of a particle. Do a unit analysis to discover how a Joule can be expressed in terms of kg, m , and s. Then you can use this to see how sqrt(J kg)/ (m^2 * s ) boils down to some combination of kg, m, and s.

Do the same for pressure ##P = F/A## to see how pressure boils down to some combination of kg, m, and s. You should find that it all checks out.
Im pretty sure P_max denotes the maximum absolute pressure. Do you happen to know if this equation is true?
Pmax is the maximum variation in the pressure from the normal atmospheric pressure. It will be very small compared to the normal atmospheric pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: llatosz
Okay, so then the answer of .258 has the potential to make sense. Doing the unit analysis for pressure gives F/A = N / m^2 = kg / (m * s^2) but after I break my equation down in those units, i get kg/s.
I'm one for learning through struggle, and youve been a great help, but is the .258 from using W/m^2, kg/m^3, and m/s in Pascals? I don't have time to spend an entire day trying to figure out this one very small fraction of a homework problem lol. I believe it would be the only unit to make sense because a .25 fluctuation in kPa would be very large for a speaker 100m away. Pascals 98% must be the correct answer
 
Yes, Pascal is the correct unit for the pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: llatosz

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K