Issue with book's solution for a block projected up an....

  • Thread starter Thread starter CVRIV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem regarding the velocity of a block projected upward, as presented in a textbook. The user initially arrived at a non-real result due to a negative value under the square root, which stemmed from using an incorrect mass of 5 kg instead of the correct 0.5 kg. After reviewing the book's solution, the user realized that they had also neglected to square the variable in their calculations. Ultimately, the user confirmed that the book's solution of 2.5 m/s was indeed correct, and their own errors led to confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly projectile motion
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation, including squaring variables
  • Knowledge of units of measurement in physics, specifically mass in kilograms
  • Ability to interpret and analyze textbook solutions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of projectile motion in physics
  • Learn about the significance of squaring variables in equations
  • Study common mistakes in physics problem-solving and how to avoid them
  • Explore additional resources or textbooks for further practice on similar problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in physics-related topics.

CVRIV
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
Hello everyone:) I'm having an issue with an example problem in the book I'm using.

I attached a pic of the problem and the book's solution.

The issue I'm having is that I have no idea how the book got the velocity it did via the solution it presented. When I worked out the problem myself, before looking at the book's solution, I arrived at the very same solution, but I was receiving non-real results, because the magnitude within the square root is negative. That's when I peaked at the book only to find that the book did what I did, except the book has 2.5m/s. I have no idea how it came to that.

I didn't want to just write that down without having some kind of explanation. Can you help me out? Is the book wrong? Am I wrong? What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • 0316190142~2.jpg
    0316190142~2.jpg
    90.7 KB · Views: 351
  • 0316190142c~2.jpg
    0316190142c~2.jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 332
Physics news on Phys.org
CVRIV said:
same solution, but I was receiving non-real results, because the magnitude within the square root is negative
I do not see how you got that from the expression in the solution. Did you forget that (-x)2 is +x2?
Please post your working.
 
I figured out what I did wrong. I was using a mass of 5kg instead of 0.5kg.

The crazy thing is that I acquired the correct value for part A using the wrong amount of mass! What happened was I didn't square the x variable so with those two mistakes, I got the right answer. Ha ha.

Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K