Intro special relativity problem regarding time dilation

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of an approximation in solving a problem involving a moving muon. The assumption is made that the muon is traveling at the speed of light, but the resulting value for the muon's velocity is actually slightly less than the speed of light. This is due to the approximation used and the precision of the given values. The conversation suggests doing the calculation both ways (with and without the approximation) to ensure the final result is reasonable.
  • #1
RagedFountain25
2
0
Homework Statement
The problem says that a muon with a proper lifetime of 2.2 microseconds is produced 100 km above the ground in the reference frame of Earth. We need to find the minimum speed the muon must travel that allows it to reach the ground in time before the end of its life.
Relevant Equations
time dilation equation: delta t from Earth frame of reference = (delta t from muon frame of reference) / Sqrt[1-(u/c)^2]
This example is worked out in the book, and at the beginning, they make the assumption that the muon is traveling at c, and then find the change in time from the Earth reference frame using delta t=100km/c. Then delta t is plugged into the time dilation equation on the left side and we solve for u. We then find that u is .999978c. My issue is I don't understand how we are able to assume that the muon was traveling at c from the beginning only to find that it was actually traveling at .999978c. Is this just an issue of approximation or is there something to the method I have misunderstood here?

This is my first post, so I'm sorry if I've done anything wrong in posting this question. I've also attached a screenshot of the problem for clarity.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (27).png
    Screenshot (27).png
    77.9 KB · Views: 101
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Assuming light speed gives approximately the time it takes for the muon to reach Earth relative to the Earth frame. In this case it is close enough, with 5 digits of precision. Divide that time by 2.2 usec and you get a gamma (dilation factor) needed. 333.33usec/2.2 usec is essentially the same (only 2 digits of precision were given for the decay) as 333.34/2.2usec

Your point is noted. The approximation would not work for something moving significantly slower.
 
  • Like
Likes RagedFountain25
  • #3
In your idea time consumed for muon to arrive alive is
[tex]\frac{L}{v}=\frac{t_M}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
where L=100km,##t_M##=2.2 ##\mu## sec. We get solution v
[tex]\frac{v}{c}=... (1)[/tex] I will leave it for your homework.

In the way you quote
[tex]\frac{L}{c}=\frac{t_M}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{v}{c}=1-\frac{c^2t_M^2}{L^2}...(2)[/tex]

Exact solution (1) is larger than the approximate one (2) in the order of ##(\frac{c t_M}{L})^4=(6.6 \times 10^{-3})^4##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes RagedFountain25
  • #4
Halc said:
Assuming light speed gives approximately the time it takes for the muon to reach Earth relative to the Earth frame. In this case it is close enough, with 5 digits of precision. Divide that time by 2.2 usec and you get a gamma (dilation factor) needed. 333.33usec/2.2 usec is essentially the same (only 2 digits of precision were given for the decay) as 333.34/2.2usec

Your point is noted. The approximation would not work for something moving significantly slower.
Ok I understand. So it is just about precision. And of course for something that is moving far slower than c, you couldn't start the problem with that assumption, (which was what threw me off from the beginning). Thank you very much.
 
  • #5
You can do it formally correctly - say the muon velocity is ##v## then ##\Delta t=100\mathrm{km}/v## and solve. But how precise to you reckon that 100km figure is? And the 2.2##\mu##s? How much difference do you reckon ##100/c## versus ##100/v## will make to (a) the answer, and (b) the maths?

You should, of course, check that your result is reasonable. Is the ##v## you get actually near ##c##? You might, as an exercise, do the same with a distance of 500m and see what ##v## you get using the approximation. Is ##v\approx c## reasonable? Then try using the full method.

Edit: too slow, I see
 

FAQ: Intro special relativity problem regarding time dilation

1. What is time dilation in special relativity?

Time dilation is a phenomenon in which time appears to pass at different rates for observers in different frames of reference. It is a consequence of Einstein's theory of special relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers.

2. How does time dilation occur in special relativity?

Time dilation occurs because the speed of light is constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This means that as an object approaches the speed of light, time appears to slow down for that object relative to a stationary observer.

3. What is the equation for time dilation in special relativity?

The equation for time dilation is t' = t / √(1 - v²/c²), where t' is the time measured by the moving observer, t is the time measured by the stationary observer, v is the relative velocity between the two observers, and c is the speed of light.

4. Can time dilation be observed in everyday life?

Yes, time dilation can be observed in everyday life, although the effects are very small at everyday speeds. For example, GPS satellites must account for time dilation in order to accurately calculate position and time for GPS devices on Earth.

5. How does time dilation affect the concept of simultaneity?

In special relativity, simultaneity is relative, meaning that two events that appear simultaneous to one observer may not appear simultaneous to another observer in a different frame of reference. Time dilation can affect the perception of simultaneity, as time may appear to pass at different rates for different observers.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top