J Baez' The meaning of Einstein's Equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaTario
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

J. Baez's paper in the July 2005 edition of the American Journal of Physics discusses the stress-energy tensor, T_{\alpha \beta}, and its implications for understanding momentum flow in spacetime. The paper asserts that pressure in a given direction corresponds to the flow of momentum in that direction, specifically denoted as P_x for the x-direction. To prove this, one can analyze the stress-energy tensor of a fluid at rest and apply Lorentz transformations to account for momentum flow in both directions. This approach clarifies the relationship between pressure and momentum flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress-energy tensor concepts
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Basic knowledge of fluid dynamics
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the stress-energy tensor for fluids
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Explore the implications of pressure as momentum flow in different physical systems
  • Review mathematical notation and LaTeX formatting for clarity in physics discussions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of general relativity and the physical interpretation of Einstein's equations.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
J Baez' "The meaning of Einstein's Equations"

Hi All,

I am trying to study the paper of Jonh Baez in the july editon of Am. J. of Phys. on the meaning of Einstein's equation.

At a given point he says:

"The components of T_{\alpha \beta} (stress-energy tensor) say how much momentum in the \alpha direction is flowing in the \beta direction through a given point of space-time, where \alpha \beta = t, x, y, z. The flow of x-momentum in the x-direction is the pressure in the x-direction denoted P_x, and similarly for y and z. It takes a while to figure out why pressure is really the flow of momentum, but its eminently worth doing."

Does anybody know how to prove this last statement.


Thank you in advance



DaTario
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for the answer, but in his site there is the same information as in the paper I have in hands.

Best Regards

DaTario
 
DaTario said:
Hi All,

I am trying to study the paper of Jonh Baez in the july editon of Am. J. of Phys. on the meaning of Einstein's equation.


DaTario


It's a bit hard to read your post since you haven't closed the latex tags properly. The latex support was added on to an existing system, so that [.itex] does not close with [.\itex] as one would expect, but rather with [./itex].
(Remove the dots!).

In answer to your question, imaginie a small box with a swarm of particles in it which move back in forth in only the x direction.

The particles will be transporting x momentum in both directions across the box. The stress energy tensor of this box will be represented by the energy density of the particles, plus an additional diagional component which represents the x- pressure.

If you are familar with how tensors transform, start with the stress-energy tensor of a fluid at rest, which is easy (it has only one term, the energy density T_00, or if you prefer T^00).

Then boost it so it consists of a fluid and/or swarm of particles moving in the +x direction.

hint: the transform is <br /> T^{cd} = T^{ab} L^c{}_a L^d{}_b<br />

where L^i{}_j is the transformation matrix, the same one that you would transform any 4-vector with, i.e.

<br /> x^b = x^a L^b{}_a<br /> [/itex]<br /> <br /> [end hint]<br /> <br /> Boost your original tensor again in the opposite direction, so it represents a fluid and/or swarm of particles moving in the -x direction.<br /> <br /> Add the two boosted tensors together - you&#039;ll get a tensor that represents the situation I described, where particles move in both directions.
 
DaTario said:
Thank you for the answer, but in his site there is the same information as in the paper I have in hands.

Best Regards

DaTario

I thought it might be a good idea to put it into the hands of the rest of us.
 
Am. J. of Phys. july edition (printed version) 2005. pg 644.

Thank you for the explanation. It was really enlightening.

Best Regards,

DaTario
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K