(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Jacobi identity in local coordinates?!?

Apparently (i.e. according to an article written by physicists), the Jacobi identity for the Poisson bracket associated to a Poisson bivector [itex]\pi = \sum\pi^{ij}\partial_i\wedge\partial_j[/itex] is equivalent to [itex]\sum_{\text{cyclic}}\pi^{i\nu}\partial_{\nu}\pi^{jk}=0[/itex] the sum is over all cyclic permutation of the i,j,k indices and the summation convention is used on the nu index. It is easy to see that this identity is equivalent to [itex]\sum_{\text{cyclic}}\{x^i,\{x^j,x^k\}\}[/itex] but why does this imply the general Jacobi identity?!?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Jacobi identity in local coordinates?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Jacobi identity local | Date |
---|---|

Are Jacobi fields defined at intersection points? | Jan 4, 2015 |

Jacobi identity for covariant derivatives proof. | Nov 24, 2013 |

Inverse Jacobi Matrix in Spherical Coordinates | Feb 23, 2013 |

Proving the Jacobi identity from invariance | Apr 17, 2012 |

Geodesic deviation & Jacobi Equation | Aug 20, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**