Jacobian Matrix of Residuals

  • Thread starter Thread starter zli034
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jacobian Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the variance and covariance of parameters in the Gamma distribution using the Jacobian matrix of residuals. It clarifies that the parameters themselves are constant and do not have variance, leading to questions about the covariance of the estimators instead. The need for a clear understanding of the Jacobian's application in this context is emphasized, particularly for those unfamiliar with exact formulations. A reference to a PDF asserting the independence of some estimators for the Gamma distribution is provided, along with a request for access to cited papers by Hwang and Hu. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in statistical estimation methods for the Gamma distribution.
zli034
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
There are 2 parameters in the Gamma distribution, alpha and beta. If sample 500 of the Gamma random variable, there unbiased mean and variance can be estimated by the sample moments.

If it is also interested to estimate the variance and covariance of the parameters, alpha and beta; Jacobian matrix of residuals has to be defined, Jr. There fore the covariance matrix is:

inverse(transpose(Jr)residual)sample variance

I want to know about the calculation of the Jacobian matrix of residuals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zli034 said:
If it is also interested to estimate the variance and covariance of the parameters, alpha and beta

Do you mean "the variance and covariance of the estimators of the parameters"? The parameters themselves are constant, they don't have a variance.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Do you mean "the variance and covariance of the estimators of the parameters"? The parameters themselves are constant, they don't have a variance.

Yes, I should stated more clearly. How to do the covariance of the estimators? I use too much simulation methods, this kind exact formulation I did not work with before.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K