Japan's Science Counil Says 'No' to ILC

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanadium 50
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Science Council of Japan has officially rejected the proposal for constructing the International Linear Collider (ILC) due to its exorbitant estimated cost of 800 billion JPY. The council highlighted the lack of clarity regarding international cost-sharing, which has hindered potential collaboration from other countries. The absence of commitment from Japan to cover a portion of the costs has been identified as a significant barrier, as typically, the host country is expected to contribute half of the expenses. This decision reflects Japan's current priorities and the competitive landscape of global particle physics projects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics and collider technology
  • Familiarity with international scientific collaboration frameworks
  • Knowledge of funding models for large-scale scientific projects
  • Awareness of current global particle physics initiatives, such as DUNE and CLIC
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the funding models for international scientific collaborations
  • Explore the technical specifications and goals of the DUNE project
  • Investigate the CLIC project and its implications for European particle physics
  • Examine the potential of China's circular accelerator and its funding strategies
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and policymakers involved in particle physics, as well as stakeholders in international scientific collaborations and funding initiatives.

Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
35,004
Reaction score
21,705
The science council of Japan has not recommended construction of the International Linear Collider in Japan, arguing that it is too expensive (800B JPY).

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20181219_38/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Ouch.
I don't see another country or group of countries stepping in either. The US is busy with DUNE, Europe would probably prefer CLIC, China is collecting money for their circular accelerator.
The council says whether the costs will be shared internationally is unclear
It would have been more clear if Japan would have committed to spend some fraction of the cost. That would have given other countries a baseline.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
This was a sticking point. The usual rule of thumb is "host country pays half". But half of the ILC cost is civil construction, leaving nothing high-tech for Japan to contribute to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K