Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian: Where did the time dependence go?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, specifically addressing the time dependence of the interaction Hamiltonian in both semiclassical and quantum contexts. The semiclassical Hamiltonian is expressed as ##H_{int,~semiclassical}=-\mu \cdot E_{0}\cos \nu t##, while the quantum version is given by ##H_{int}=\hbar g(\sigma _{+}a+\sigma _{-}a^{\dagger })##, which is time-independent. Participants explore the implications of this time independence, questioning how it relates to the classical case and the transition to the interaction picture. The conversation highlights the closed system nature of the Jaynes-Cummings model, emphasizing energy conservation as a reason for the absence of time dependence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Jaynes-Cummings model
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics terminology, including Hamiltonians and operators
  • Knowledge of the interaction picture in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of semiclassical approximations in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian in detail
  • Research the implications of time-independent Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the interaction picture and its application in quantum systems
  • Examine the role of closed systems in energy conservation within quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum optics, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts will benefit from this discussion.

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
TL;DR
Semiclassically, the electric field varies harmonically in time, but sometimes, in the JC Hamiltonian, the time dependence disappears. What???
Consider the interaction of a two level atom and an electric field (semiclassically, we treat the field as 'external' i.e. not influenced by the atom; the full quantum treats the change in the field as well)

Electric field in semiclassical Hamiltonian: plane wave

##H_{int,~semiclassical}=-\mu \cdot E=-\mu \cdot E_{0}\cos \nu t##

Electric field in Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, single mode i.e. plane wave
(Schrödinger picture)

##H_{int}=\hbar g(\sigma _{+}a+\sigma _{-}a^{\dagger })##

\bigskip

We realize ##H_{int}## is time independent! So where did the time-harmonic
dependence go? How does this compare to the classical case?

Also, how are we supposed to go to the interaction picture, with a constant
hamiltonian?

Furthermore, ##H_{int,~semiclassical}## is time-dependent, but isn't this the
Schrödinger picture Hamiltonian? Shouldn't it be time-independent?

Possibly related: Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics: constant
perturbation turned on at t=0!?

Also see:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...hen-the-hamiltonian-is-time-dependent.971007/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is also possible to add a time-dependent drive term to the J-C Hamiltonian.
However, in the simples case you have a situation where the energy is continuously moving between the cavity and the two-level systems; i.e. it is a closed system and there is no real time-dependence.

Note that the J-C Hamiltonian in the "strong driving" regime gets really complicated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Demystifier said:
In the JC Hamiltonian, the field is quantized. It's not a semiclassical approximation.
Yes I understand that it's quantized, but... why must find dependence disappear if it's quantized?

f95toli said:
it is a closed system and there is no real time-dependence.
Perhaps this is a good hint. Closed system=energy conservation=no time dependence, but:
How do we know if the system is closed?
Why no time dependence=energy conservation?....
 
yucheng said:
Yes I understand that it's quantized, but... why must find dependence disappear if it's quantized?
Because the time dependence of operators usually disappears in the Schrödinger picture.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
930
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K