A Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian: Where did the time dependence go?

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
Semiclassically, the electric field varies harmonically in time, but sometimes, in the JC Hamiltonian, the time dependence disappears. What???
Consider the interaction of a two level atom and an electric field (semiclassically, we treat the field as 'external' i.e. not influenced by the atom; the full quantum treats the change in the field as well)

Electric field in semiclassical Hamiltonian: plane wave

##H_{int,~semiclassical}=-\mu \cdot E=-\mu \cdot E_{0}\cos \nu t##

Electric field in Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, single mode i.e. plane wave
(Schrodinger picture)

##H_{int}=\hbar g(\sigma _{+}a+\sigma _{-}a^{\dagger })##

\bigskip

We realize ##H_{int}## is time independent! So where did the time-harmonic
dependence go? How does this compare to the classical case?

Also, how are we supposed to go to the interaction picture, with a constant
hamiltonian?

Furthermore, ##H_{int,~semiclassical}## is time-dependent, but isn't this the
Schrodinger picture Hamiltonian? Shouldn't it be time-independent?

Possibly related: Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics: constant
perturbation turned on at t=0!?

Also see:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...hen-the-hamiltonian-is-time-dependent.971007/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is also possible to add a time-dependent drive term to the J-C Hamiltonian.
However, in the simples case you have a situation where the energy is continuously moving between the cavity and the two-level systems; i.e. it is a closed system and there is no real time-dependence.

Note that the J-C Hamiltonian in the "strong driving" regime gets really complicated.
 
Demystifier said:
In the JC Hamiltonian, the field is quantized. It's not a semiclassical approximation.
Yes I understand that it's quantized, but... why must find dependence disappear if it's quantized?

f95toli said:
it is a closed system and there is no real time-dependence.
Perhaps this is a good hint. Closed system=energy conservation=no time dependence, but:
How do we know if the system is closed?
Why no time dependence=energy conservation?....
 
yucheng said:
Yes I understand that it's quantized, but... why must find dependence disappear if it's quantized?
Because the time dependence of operators usually disappears in the Schrodinger picture.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top