A Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian: Where did the time dependence go?

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
Semiclassically, the electric field varies harmonically in time, but sometimes, in the JC Hamiltonian, the time dependence disappears. What???
Consider the interaction of a two level atom and an electric field (semiclassically, we treat the field as 'external' i.e. not influenced by the atom; the full quantum treats the change in the field as well)

Electric field in semiclassical Hamiltonian: plane wave

##H_{int,~semiclassical}=-\mu \cdot E=-\mu \cdot E_{0}\cos \nu t##

Electric field in Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, single mode i.e. plane wave
(Schrodinger picture)

##H_{int}=\hbar g(\sigma _{+}a+\sigma _{-}a^{\dagger })##

\bigskip

We realize ##H_{int}## is time independent! So where did the time-harmonic
dependence go? How does this compare to the classical case?

Also, how are we supposed to go to the interaction picture, with a constant
hamiltonian?

Furthermore, ##H_{int,~semiclassical}## is time-dependent, but isn't this the
Schrodinger picture Hamiltonian? Shouldn't it be time-independent?

Possibly related: Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics: constant
perturbation turned on at t=0!?

Also see:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...hen-the-hamiltonian-is-time-dependent.971007/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is also possible to add a time-dependent drive term to the J-C Hamiltonian.
However, in the simples case you have a situation where the energy is continuously moving between the cavity and the two-level systems; i.e. it is a closed system and there is no real time-dependence.

Note that the J-C Hamiltonian in the "strong driving" regime gets really complicated.
 
Demystifier said:
In the JC Hamiltonian, the field is quantized. It's not a semiclassical approximation.
Yes I understand that it's quantized, but... why must find dependence disappear if it's quantized?

f95toli said:
it is a closed system and there is no real time-dependence.
Perhaps this is a good hint. Closed system=energy conservation=no time dependence, but:
How do we know if the system is closed?
Why no time dependence=energy conservation?....
 
yucheng said:
Yes I understand that it's quantized, but... why must find dependence disappear if it's quantized?
Because the time dependence of operators usually disappears in the Schrodinger picture.
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...

Similar threads

Back
Top