Hi everyone(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I don't know if I can find someone here to help me understand this issue, but I'll try

the jensen inequality can be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jensen%27s_inequality

I have the following discrete random variable [itex]X[/itex] with the following pmf:

x 0 1 2 3

pr(x) 0.110521 0.359341 0.389447 0.140691

and the summation is (1).

defining the function [itex]Y=\frac{1}{X}[/itex]

Then finding the [itex]\bar{X}=\sum_{i=0}^{3}{iPr(i)=1.560308}[/itex]

Now calculating [itex]E[Y]=E[\frac{1}{X}]=\sum_{i=1}^{3}{\frac{1}{i}Pr(i)}=0.6009615[/itex]

then:

[itex]Y(\bar{X})=\frac{1}{\bar{X}}=\frac{1}{1.560308}=0.640899105[/itex]

According to Jensen inequality what should happen:

[itex]E[\frac{1}{X}] \geq \frac{1}{E[X]}[/itex]

but what I got is the opposite case!!!!!!!!

Now also I have to mention the function [itex]Y=\frac{1}{X}[/itex] is convex given that the second derivative is strictly larger than zero.

Do I misunderstand the Jensen inequality? or is there something wrong with the convixity assumption?

Any idea?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Jensen inequality, unexplained distribution, very confusing problem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**