MHB Jessica's question at Yahoo Answers regarding approximate integration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on approximating the area under the curve of the function f(x) = 9/x over the interval [1, 3] using four subintervals with right endpoints. The areas of the rectangles formed by these subintervals are calculated, resulting in an approximate integral value of 8.55. The conversation also highlights that increasing the number of subintervals can improve the approximation, leading to a more accurate limit as n approaches infinity. The exact integral value is established as 9ln(3), approximately 9.89. The thread emphasizes the importance of using more subintervals for better accuracy in definite integral approximations.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Area of the definite integral?

Find an approximation of the area of the region R under the graph of the function f on the interval [1, 3]. Use n = 4 subintervals. Choose the representative points to be the right endpoints of the subintervals.
f(x) = 9/x

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Jessica's quation at Yahoo! Answers regarding approximate integration

Hello Jessica,

Let's look at a plot of the curve and the 4 rectangles the sum of whose areas we are to use to get an approximate value for the definite integral $$\int_1^3\frac{9}{x}\,dx$$:

View attachment 924

Rectangles have an area $A$ given by $A=bh$ where $b$ in the measure of the base and $h$ is the measure of the height. For each of these rectangles the base is $$\frac{3-1}{4}=\frac{1}{2}$$.

The red rectangle has an area of:

$$A_1=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{9}{\frac{3}{2}}=3$$

The green rectangle has an area of:

$$A_2=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{9}{2}=\frac{9}{4}$$

The blue rectangle has an area of:

$$A_3=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{9}{\frac{5}{2}}=\frac{9}{5}$$

The orange rectangle has an area of:

$$A_4=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{9}{3}=\frac{3}{2}$$

And so we may state:

$$\int_1^3\frac{9}{x}\,dx\approx3+\frac{9}{4}+\frac{9}{5}+\frac{3}{2}=\frac{171}{20}=8.55$$

We can improve the approximation by taking more sub-intervals. Let's let $n$ be the number of these regular partitions, and using the right-end-points, we may state the area of the $k$th rectangle as:

$$\Delta A=\frac{3-1}{n}\cdot\frac{9}{1+k\cdot\frac{2}{n}}=\frac{18}{n+2k}$$

And so we may state:

$$\int_1^3\frac{9}{x}\,dx\approx18\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{n+2k}$$

$$\int_1^3\frac{9}{x}\,dx=18\lim_{n\to\infty}\left( \sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{n+2k} \right)$$

Now, since we know:

$$\int_1^3\frac{9}{x}\,dx=9\ln(3)\approx9.887510598013$$

We may state:

$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{n+2k} \right)=\ln\left(\sqrt{3} \right)$$
 

Attachments

  • jessica.jpg
    jessica.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 106
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top