Jitter: Definition & Understanding Scientists' Usage

  • Thread starter Thread starter dervast
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Jitter is commonly defined as the deviation in the scheduled arrival of events, particularly in engineering contexts like DVD mastering, where it refers to timing inaccuracies. The discussion highlights that scientists may use the term differently, suggesting a need for clarity in its definition. Additionally, the term "zitterbewegung," which means "jittery motion," is mentioned in relation to relativistic quantum mechanics, indicating its broader scientific relevance. There is an implication that a mathematical framework may exist to describe jitter more precisely. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurate communication in scientific discussions.
dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Good morning:) I have noticed that many scientists use the term jittert slightly different than others :)
How can i denote the term jitter? Do u have sth in mind?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dervast said:
Good morning:) I have noticed that many scientists use the term jittert slightly different than others :)
How can i denote the term jitter? Do u have sth in mind?

Okay, I'll bite. What is "jitter?"

-Dan
 
I don't know what jitter is .. that's why i am asking
 
I know it from engineering (DVD mastering and such). There jitter is the deviation of an event´s scheduled arrival, in time or space. So maybe on a DVD the next pit should be read in 5 µs, but comes typically after 5 µs +- 100 ns. The ns are jitter.
 
Thx a lot for the answer.. So if jitter has to do with deviation perhaps a mathematical type exists
 
Then there's also zitterbewegung (or something like that) which translates roughly to "jittery motion". It comes up in relativistic quantum mechanics to describe a rapid oscillation.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
7K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K