John Edwards a fake or the real deal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Max
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around John Edwards, a psychic known for his show "Crossing Over," where he claims to communicate with the deceased. Participants express skepticism about his abilities, debating whether he is a genuine medium or a fraud. Many argue that his techniques, such as cold reading and vague statements, allow him to manipulate audience emotions and perceptions. Critics highlight the ethical implications of his work, suggesting that he exploits vulnerable individuals seeking closure. Some participants reference the work of skeptics like James Randi, who have exposed fraudulent practices in the psychic industry. The conversation also touches on the broader topic of belief in psychics and the lack of scientific evidence supporting their claims, with some asserting that without proof, the default position should be skepticism towards such abilities. Overall, the thread reflects a mix of skepticism, concern for emotional manipulation, and a call for accountability in the psychic profession.
  • #101
Well it depends what you can do.

I'm sure the government would be very interested in someone with psychic ability, especially with their track record in this area.

Attracting too much attention could mean you end up on some military base for the rest of your life.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
As in 'Minority Report'?
There's a film for every nutty idea, I think.
 
  • #103
Well as I understand it they have previously spent money on 'investigating' various paranormal / psychic ability. So it wouldn't be hard to believe they'd get you on side one way or another (or at least try it).
 
Back
Top