Jordan-Holder Theorem for Modules .... ....

  • Context:
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Theorem
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.16 (Jordan-Holder) ... ...

Proposition 4.2.16 reads as follows:
View attachment 8240
View attachment 8241

Near the middle of the above proof (top of page 116) we read the following:

"... ... If $$M_1 \neq N_1$$ then $$M_1 + N_1 = M$$ since $$N_1$$ is a maximal submodule of $$M$$. ... ... "

Can someone please explain exactly how $$N_1$$ being a maximal submodule of $$M$$ implies that $$M_1 + N_1 = M$$ ... ... ?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Peter said:
Near the middle of the above proof (top of page 116) we read the following:

"... ... If $$M_1 \neq N_1$$ then $$M_1 + N_1 = M$$ since $$N_1$$ is a maximal submodule of $$M$$. ... ... "

Since $M_{1}\neq N_{1}$, $M_{1}+N_{1}$ is a submodule of $M$ containing the maximal submodule $N_{1}$ and so must be $M$.
 
GJA said:
Hi Peter,
Since $M_{1}\neq N_{1}$, $M_{1}+N_{1}$ is a submodule of $M$ containing the maximal submodule $N_{1}$ and so must be $M$.
Thanks for the help, GJA ...

Peter