Jordan wigner transform and periodic boundary condition

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
i think jordan wigner transform, when applied to open boundary system, can simplify a spin 1/2 system to a free fermion system

but there is a difficulty in the case of periodic boundary condition

in this case, we have to deal with terms like

[tex]S_N^+S_1^-=(-)^{\sum_{k=1}^{N-1}n_k} a_N^\dagger a_1[/tex]

the phase term cannot drop out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E.H. Lieb, T.D. Schultz, and D.C. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought Nielson's would help you!
http://www.qinfo.org/people/nielsen/blog/archive/notes/fermions_and_jordan_wigner.pdf
Yes, it is just an idea, you should calculate it by youself!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I cannot understand the relationship between the periodicity(periodic boundary or antiperiodic boundary) and the parity!
 
peteratcam said:
E.H. Lieb, T.D. Schultz, and D.C. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4

yes, they also have to deal with this problem

but to my surprise, they can handle it!
 
Last edited by a moderator: