Jordan wigner transform and periodic boundary condition

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the application of the Jordan-Wigner transform to spin 1/2 systems, particularly in the context of periodic boundary conditions. Participants explore the implications of this transform for simplifying systems to free fermions and the challenges posed by phase terms in periodic boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the Jordan-Wigner transform can simplify a spin 1/2 system to a free fermion system in open boundary conditions, but notes difficulties with periodic boundary conditions.
  • Another participant raises a question about the relationship between periodicity (periodic or antiperiodic boundary conditions) and parity.
  • References to a paper by Lieb, Schultz, and Mattis are provided, indicating that they also addressed similar challenges with periodic boundary conditions.
  • A participant mentions a resource by Nielson, suggesting it might be helpful, but emphasizes that calculations should be done independently.
  • There is a mention of a phase term that cannot be disregarded in the context of periodic boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of periodic boundary conditions and the relationship to parity, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical terms and relationships that are not fully defined in the discussion, leaving some assumptions and dependencies on definitions unclear.

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
i think jordan wigner transform, when applied to open boundary system, can simplify a spin 1/2 system to a free fermion system

but there is a difficulty in the case of periodic boundary condition

in this case, we have to deal with terms like

S_N^+S_1^-=(-)^{\sum_{k=1}^{N-1}n_k} a_N^\dagger a_1

the phase term cannot drop out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E.H. Lieb, T.D. Schultz, and D.C. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought Nielson's would help you!
http://www.qinfo.org/people/nielsen/blog/archive/notes/fermions_and_jordan_wigner.pdf
Yes, it is just an idea, you should calculate it by youself!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I cannot understand the relationship between the periodicity(periodic boundary or antiperiodic boundary) and the parity!
 
peteratcam said:
E.H. Lieb, T.D. Schultz, and D.C. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4

yes, they also have to deal with this problem

but to my surprise, they can handle it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K