Just got external funding what now?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Funding
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the implications of obtaining external funding for a PhD application in theoretical physics. Participants explore how to effectively communicate this funding to admission committees at American universities, considering its potential impact on the application process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses hope that the external funding will positively influence their PhD application and seeks advice on how to inform admission committees.
  • Another suggests emailing professors directly, especially if there has been prior contact, to inform them about the fellowship.
  • Concerns are raised about the relevance of one-year funding to the admission committees, with some participants questioning whether it would be considered significant.
  • It is proposed that if there is a possibility of renewing the funding, this should be communicated to the committees, while being honest about the lack of renewal options if applicable.
  • One participant notes that the relevance of the funding may depend on departmental funding structures and the potential for future financial support.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of ensuring the funding information reaches the graduate admissions committee, suggesting multiple attempts to communicate this information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of one-year funding and its relevance to the admission committees. There is no consensus on the best approach to communicate this information, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for ensuring the funding is acknowledged.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various factors that could influence the relevance of the funding, including departmental policies on graduate student funding and the competitive nature of funding applications. There are unresolved questions about how funding impacts admission decisions and the importance of communicating funding status.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
I am waiting to hear back from a few american universities about my application for a phd in theoretical physics. I just got news that I have obtained external funding from my home (European) country, enough to cover the first year (tuition + stipend).

I hope this will positively influence my application. However, what is the best way to make sure the admission committees get this updated info?

I have just sent an email to each university, to the email address I could find that was most closely related to the office of graduate admissions for the physics programme. Should I just hope that that suffices, or should I also try other measures like calling?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nonequilibrium said:
I am waiting to hear back from a few american universities about my application for a phd in theoretical physics. I just got news that I have obtained external funding from my home (European) country, enough to cover the first year (tuition + stipend).

I hope this will positively influence my application. However, what is the best way to make sure the admission committees get this updated info?

I have just sent an email to each university, to the email address I could find that was most closely related to the office of graduate admissions for the physics programme. Should I just hope that that suffices, or should I also try other measures like calling?

Thank you!

If you have had any contact with any of the professors you are interested in working with, you might send them an e-mail, as well, letting them know that you have been offered a fellowship by your home country.
 
Thanks for the reply!

Are you sure they would think it is relevant to them if it's only for the first year?
 
nonequilibrium said:
Thanks for the reply!

Are you sure they would think it is relevant to them if it's only for the first year?

If there is a chance of renewal, let them know. If there is no chance of renewal, let them know, as well. Be honest.
 
That wasn't my question but thanks for the effort (no irony). Just mailed at least one prof. I suppose I should just play the waiting game.
 
nonequilibrium said:
That wasn't my question but thanks for the effort (no irony). Just mailed at least one prof. I suppose I should just play the waiting game.

I thought that my answer to your question was implicit in the answer I gave, but in retrospect, I can see how it is not that obvious.

It could be relevant to them, but it depends upon how money is allocated in the Department/School, and it depends upon whether this one-yearof funding can become more years of funding, down the road. For instance, at many schools, graduate students are required to teach (for pay). If you joined the group of Prof. X, he could see that he would need to pay you for one less year than if you came in without funds. Another variable is that if you were successful in receiving funding in a competitive environment in your home country, this might mean that you would be competitive for university-wide graduate scholarships (internal money).

The best-case would be if you could receive multi-year funding from your home country.

So, yes it is relevant. Depending upon the circumstances, it could be more or less relevant. It definitely should be part of the information that the graduate committee has in front of them. If you come to them without cost this year, they may be willing to make an offer. [i.e. Maybe this is a tight year for the department, but they are more confident about next year...] You should try to get this information in front of the graduate admissions committee, and making multiple attempts at this helps to guarantee that they see it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K