Just plain not being able to hack it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beeza
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by undergraduate students in physics, particularly during the latter part of their junior year. Participants share their experiences with academic pressure, burnout, and the transition to graduate school, touching on topics such as study habits, exam performance, and the perceived difficulty of upper-level courses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about hitting a "rock wall" in their studies after previously excelling, questioning their ability to continue in a challenging major.
  • Another participant suggests that burnout is common around junior year due to the intense workload and lack of social life, but reassures that graduate school may offer a better balance.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of sleep and managing time effectively, with one noting that they prioritize sleep over a social life.
  • There are differing views on the workload in graduate school, with some claiming it is more manageable while others warn of long hours and little free time.
  • One participant shares a strategy for exam preparation, recommending that students identify potential pitfalls in advance and create reminders to focus on weak areas.
  • Another participant reflects on the difficulty of physics compared to other subjects, noting that grading standards can differ significantly between disciplines.
  • Some participants discuss their struggles with developing effective study habits, particularly when transitioning to more advanced courses.
  • There are mentions of differences in academic structures, such as qualifying exams, between institutions in the UK and the US.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the third and fourth years of undergraduate study can be particularly challenging, with many expressing feelings of burnout and questioning their abilities. However, there are competing views on the nature of graduate school and the workload involved, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to managing these challenges.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that their struggles may stem from poor study habits developed in earlier years, and there is acknowledgment of varying academic expectations and experiences across different institutions and countries.

Beeza
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
What are the chances someone is able to do well in their early undergraduate years, but hit a rock wall the second half of their junior year? I mean I've done really well up until this semester. I've maintained highest honors, done substantial research and been published in a journal as a co-author, and even been a teaching assistant. I then started to get my hopes up of going to graduate school etc, but those hopes are fading now.

My troubles started a little bit last semester with upper level mechanics, and I only managed to do well on one exam. I ended up with a B in the class because of an enormous curve due to everyone doing poorly. Now, the same thing is happening to me with E&M and QM. I'm beginning to think that I just plain can't hack it in such a difficult major. I don't mind the studying, but I study atleast twice (maybe three) as much as some classmates whom are slackers and still get the same grades as them. I do the homework alone and in a reasonable amount of time, but completely freak out on exams and draw idiotic blanks. It's extremely annoying and as if hard work no longer equals rewarding grades.

I understand that most things in life worth doing are not going to be easy, but when do you know enough is enough and just plain calling it quits? If my freaking brain full? What the hell is going on? What are indications that you are good enough to keep progressing while still maintaining some form of sanity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its called burned out. It happens around Junior year when your just so *** damn tired of grinding it out day and night with no social life to keep your grades high as your classes get harder and projects more intense. But afterwards, you get to be in grad school, have much less work, get paid, and have free time! So just stick it through and life will get better, I even have time for the gym now!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To hell with a social life, I just want enough sleep that I'm ever awake enough after classes to have some shot at doing homework in time to get any sleep. Recursive lack of sleep sucks!
 
That too! :smile: God I love sleep these days.
 
That's the one thing I'm looking forward to about grad school (other than the obvious getting to spend your time learning to do research instead of studying for one exam after another...well, after quals anyway...). From what I hear, you still have very little life outside school (i.e. 60 hour weeks what with time in the lab, grading papers, courses, etc.)...but you can actually *go to sleep* at night and come back to the stuff later. Finally I'll be able to stop regretting that I didn't major in history or some fluffy liberal arts thing like that! :rolleyes:
 
Asphodel said:
From what I hear, you still have very little life outside school
Well, I don't know about that: at least, it's not like that for me!
 
Me neither. I don't TA or grade. I go out every weekend and relax with my friends. Unless your getting a PhD, there are no Qualifying exams either.
 
The third and fourth year get tough for everybody. I will admit though, it is a lot easier to get a B in a philosophy class missing a lecture a week that it is in math or physics.

I don't mind the studying, but I study atleast twice (maybe three) as much as some classmates whom are slackers and still get the same grades as them. I do the homework alone and in a reasonable amount of time, but completely freak out on exams and draw idiotic blanks. It's extremely annoying and as if hard work no longer equals rewarding grades.

I do have a little advice to offer up on exams. Normally, I try to figure out places where I may go wrong on exams long in advance of the actual exam. I write reminders and notes to myself to review problems and concepts I think will show up, and a page of reminders about what not to do and review it before I head into an exam. It helps me to focus on weak areas and eliminate them when it counts. It might help.
 
cristo said:
Well, I don't know about that: at least, it's not like that for me!
Cyrus said:
Me neither. I don't TA or grade. I go out every weekend and relax with my friends. Unless your getting a PhD, there are no Qualifying exams either.

:!)

I think quals vary a bit depending on the university / department. But none of the places I've seen without them (yet) are programs I'm seriously considering. I suppose that's one point in deciding to say fark it all and get an engineering masters instead, but I like the research track a lot more than ending up in a cubicle somewhere making shareholders happy.

AsianSensationK said:
The third and fourth year get tough for everybody. I will admit though, it is a lot easier to get a B in a philosophy class missing a lecture a week that it is in math or physics.

Pff, I can get a B in most physics classes without showing up, while philosophy classes usually grade to some degree on "participation" meaning "actually showing up to class". At which point it's hard not to get an A. I just rarely get material in physics/math classes explained well enough (assuming I do show up regularly, and excluding the first year stuff that is easy as pie) to really *understand* the material enough to leave the class feeling like I learned much. Lecture classes often rely on the idea of you doing most of your actual learning from office hours, study groups, department/university help programs...meaning commuter students get boned. It's especially amusing since I've heard our dean of undergrad affairs expressing his concern about the issue, so the college knows it exists, but neither of us have any great ideas on solving the problem it would seem.

It's all good, I guess...my physics GPA isn't as high as it was before I transferred (4.0 vs ~3.4-3.5) but I keep passing my classes, so maybe I just have higher standards of mastery (or am inferring higher standards) than the school really expects of undergrads? Meh...


Seriously though, Beeza. Physics is hard stuff, even for the physicists. It looks damn easy when the professors do it because they've been at this stuff for 30+ years and know more tricks for solving various problems than any undergrad could possibly be expected to remember. Most sane physics undergrads go through periods of questioning their abilities, the ones that make it through are mostly too stubborn to give up more than just being smarter than you or some nonsense like that.
 
  • #10
I too am in your position. I blame most of it on my freshmen year habits. I came into college having had a wonderful physics class in high school, thus I breezed through freshmen year taking intro level physics 1 and 2, as well as Calculus 3 and Linear Algebra.

Beginning of this year I still breezed through modern physics number theory and Diff EQ, yet I hit a brick wall taking Real Analysis. (mistake to take those three maths at the same time)

Now this semester I thought it would get better, I have been breezing through Math Methods of Physics but am struggling with E and M which I am taking this semester due to scheduling conflicts that would have arisen next year. I just never developed the right kind of study habits for exams like AsianSensationK has mentioned.

I think it just takes some determination. I go through periods of ups and downs but I figure I've come way to far to give up now and switch to a math major
 
  • #11
Asphodel said:
I think quals vary a bit depending on the university / department.

I'm from the UK; we don't have such things as qualifying exams!
 
  • #12
cristo said:
I'm from the UK; we don't have such things as qualifying exams!

Yeah, I also hear y'all take a year or three less to get your PhDs too. And don't get stuck taking as much touchy feely stuff as an undergrad that has absolutely not crap to do with anything.
 
  • #13
I had to take (and pass) "Qual Exams Lite" in a Master's program, so the only-Ph.D. rule is not universally true.

Still, they were probably 1/4 as hard (if that) as what I would expect in a Ph.D. program.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K