I Justification of a trick in solving PDEs arising in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pdes Physics
Click For Summary
In solving partial differential equations (PDEs) like the heat equation or wave equation, assuming solutions are independent of certain variables can simplify the process, but this approach may not apply universally. For instance, in the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom, despite the potential being central and angle-independent, the solutions still exhibit angular dependence due to the nature of spherical harmonics. This raises the question of how to determine when such assumptions are valid without exhaustive verification. The discussion highlights that while boundary conditions can sometimes eliminate angular dependence in solutions, this is not the case for the Schrödinger equation, where angular momentum considerations lead to non-spherically symmetric solutions. Understanding these nuances is crucial for correctly applying separation of variables in different PDE contexts.
  • #91
fluidistic said:
I still do not see it entirely

A function that vanishes at infinity in three dimensions does not have to vanish at the same "rate" (dependence on ##r##) in different directions as ##r \rightarrow \infty##.
 
  • Informative
Likes fluidistic
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Thanks for all, PeterDonis. I think this is much clearer to me now. I would love to study some group theory, as it is used in Physics in a lot of areas, and my knowledge is lacking there.
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345
  • #93
fluidistic said:
Thanks for all, PeterDonis. I think this is much clearer to me now.

You're welcome! Glad I could help.
 
  • Like
Likes fluidistic and bob012345
  • #94
Isn't this a bit too complicated? For one-particle wavefunctions, a (pure) state can only be spherically symmetric around the origin if it depends only on ##r=|\vec{x}|## which automatically makes to an eigenstate of ##\hat{\vec{L}}^2## to the eigenvalue ##0##, i.e., ##\ell=0##.

Any superposition of wave functions with ##\ell=1## (dipole or ##p## waves) is thus not spherically symmetric.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K