Justification of a trick in solving PDEs arising in Physics

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pdes Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the justification of assuming independence from angular variables when solving partial differential equations (PDEs) like the heat equation and the Schrödinger equation. Participants highlight that while boundary conditions can lead to solutions that appear angle-independent in some PDEs, this assumption fails in the Schrödinger equation due to the inherent angular dependence of the Laplacian operator. Specifically, the eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom involve spherical harmonics, indicating that angular dependence cannot be ignored, contrasting with the heat equation where such dependence may not manifest in the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation and its applications
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of boundary conditions in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of boundary conditions in PDE solutions
  • Learn about the properties of spherical harmonics and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the existence and uniqueness theorems for PDEs
  • Investigate the differences between time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum mechanics and differential equations, particularly those interested in the implications of boundary conditions and angular dependencies in PDE solutions.

  • #91
fluidistic said:
I still do not see it entirely

A function that vanishes at infinity in three dimensions does not have to vanish at the same "rate" (dependence on ##r##) in different directions as ##r \rightarrow \infty##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: fluidistic
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Thanks for all, PeterDonis. I think this is much clearer to me now. I would love to study some group theory, as it is used in Physics in a lot of areas, and my knowledge is lacking there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345
  • #93
fluidistic said:
Thanks for all, PeterDonis. I think this is much clearer to me now.

You're welcome! Glad I could help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fluidistic and bob012345
  • #94
Isn't this a bit too complicated? For one-particle wavefunctions, a (pure) state can only be spherically symmetric around the origin if it depends only on ##r=|\vec{x}|## which automatically makes to an eigenstate of ##\hat{\vec{L}}^2## to the eigenvalue ##0##, i.e., ##\ell=0##.

Any superposition of wave functions with ##\ell=1## (dipole or ##p## waves) is thus not spherically symmetric.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K