Kaon discovered by the unusual fork

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kaon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the historical discovery of the neutral kaon and the reasoning used to differentiate it from the neutron in decay processes, particularly focusing on the K2pi decay mode. Participants explore the evidence and methods used in 1947 to identify the kaon, including considerations of particle lifetimes and conservation laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the kaon was discovered through its decay into a positive and neutral pion and questions how researchers at the time ruled out the neutron as the decaying particle.
  • Another participant explains that neutrons are generally stable in accelerator experiments, with much longer lifetimes compared to the kaon, which could help in distinguishing between the two particles.
  • It is mentioned that measuring the momentum of the pions allows for reconstruction of the mass of the decayed particle, which could provide further evidence against the neutron hypothesis.
  • A later reply clarifies that the decay in question involves a negative pion and emphasizes that the mass calculated from the decay products consistently indicates a mass around 500 MeV, which is significantly less than that of the neutron.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methods used to identify the kaon and the reasoning behind ruling out the neutron, but the discussion remains exploratory without a definitive consensus on all aspects of the historical context.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their discussion, including the dependence on the understanding of particle lifetimes and conservation laws at the time of the kaon's discovery.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Kaon discovered by "the unusual fork"

So historically (reading about it in Griffiths) the (neutral) kaon was discovered by noting that there was some neutral particle decaying into a positive and neutral pion.

But how did they know at the time (1947) that it was not the neutron doing this? Of course now we know this is not possible due to, say, baryon number. But how did they know it wasn't the neutron at the time. The only thing I can think of is that the kaon lifetime is shorter than the neutron's. Is that it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Neutrons are "stable" in accelerator experiments - while you might see a decay from time to time, usual flight times are measured in nanoseconds, while the lifetime of the neutrons is several minutes.
In addition, if you can measure the momentum of the charged and neutral pion, you can reconstruct the mass of the decayed particle.

there was some neutral particle decaying into a positive and neutral pion.
Charge conservation? Do you mean positive+negative pion?
 


Yes, sorry, I meant negative.

And thanks for the answer.
 


Furthermore, the decay you discuss, called K2pi, has only the two pions in the final state; if one measured the momentum of those pions and calculated the mass of the parent, oine always got about 500 MeV, half of the neutron's mass. That demonstrates that it's not neutrons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K